Patti Cotton

Executive Coach & Career Strategist

Patti Cotton

Combating Decision Fatigue: Empowering Executives to Make Better Choices

By 1 Comment

Combating Decision Fatigue: Empowering Executives to Make Better Choices
Image Credit: Depositphotos

Imagine Jane (a real situation, but fictitious name), a senior executive at a fast-growing tech company. Jane is brilliant, driven, and deeply committed to her role; and her leadership has helped the company outperform its two main competitors.

When I met her, however, Jane was feeling overwhelmed.

“Every day presents a relentless stream of decisions, both big and small. Honestly, it feels harder and harder to keep up. I’m mentally exhausted.”

What Jane was experiencing is decision fatigue, a common challenge for leaders like her, who oversee a volatile and dynamic environment.

Decision fatigue occurs when the quality of our decisions declines after an extended period of decision-making. For someone in Jane’s position, the constant need to make high-stakes decisions, coupled with managing complex issues, exacerbates this phenomenon.

Factors contributing to decision fatigue most often include the following:

  • Volume of Decisions – Jane faced an endless array of decisions daily, from strategic directions to operational details.
  • High-Stakes Nature – Each decision carries significant consequences, adding immense pressure.
  • Lack of Rest – Jane rarely took breaks, leading to mental exhaustion and diminished cognitive function.

Effect on the Team

As I talked with members of Jane’s team, it was clear that they were eager to support her and at the same time, concerned with how her leadership was taking a turn.

“She always seems tired, and when I present her with an issue, she seems to struggle to think clearly,” said one.

“True,’ said another. “She was quick to make choices that are straightforward, but they seem overwhelming, now.”

All agreed that Jane now became easily frustrated over minor issues. “I’m not even sure when to bring things to her attention,” said a third. “I’m starting to lose confidence in our ability to pull things off.”

It was clear that decision fatigue didn’t just affect Jane—it rippled through her leadership and organization, as it always does.

  • Jane experienced decreased productivity and heightened stress, edging towards burnout.
  • Jane’s impaired judgment and indecisiveness undermined her leadership effectiveness.
  • Her team’s morale and performance suffered, as they lost confidence in her decision-making.
  • This decline was starting to impact the company’s overall performance.

Internal Shifts and External Changes

To address decision fatigue, Jane had to make both internal shifts and external changes.

First, Jane had to recognize the real problem.

She initially perceived that she was simply overwhelmed by the volume of decisions. However, the real issue lay in her lack of effective decision-making strategies and self-care practices. Without these, the cognitive load became unmanageable.

Jane’s inner shifts included prioritizing self-care and mental health with regular exercise, enough sleep, and mindfulness and stress management techniques. This helped to recalibrate her nervous system and scattered thinking, and to replace this with a solid sense of calm and the ability to focus well.

She also needed to create a decision-making framework to simplify her process by categorizing decisions and delegating lower-stake choices.

These were simple shifts, but they required initiating new habits. As we worked on these, we also worked on some key external changes, including reviewing where Jane needed to delegate decision-making and how she might develop the trust to do so.

We also worked with her team to implement structured decision-making processes to ensure consistency.

And finally, Jane acknowledged that regular breaks and time off would be vital to helping her recharge. She recognized that this would be important for her team, as well, and they came to a mutual decision to implement this team wide.

What did this ultimately do for Jane and her company?

As I shared in the beginning, today, Jane’s company is out in front of her two main competitors with the lion’s share of the market. After establishing norms for decision-making, along with mental health and self-care, she was able to focus on developing a supportive work environment and to lead in the way that only someone in her role could.

What does this mean for you?

Jane’s story illustrates how decision fatigue can affect even the most capable leaders. By understanding its causes and impacts, and taking proactive steps to mitigate its effects, executives can enhance their decision-making capabilities.

Implementing both internal shifts, such as self-care and mindfulness, and external changes, like effective delegation and structured processes, can empower them to lead more effectively. This not only improves their well-being but also ensures their teams and organizations thrive.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

From Firefighting to Strategic Leadership: Breaking the Cycle of Urgency

By 1 Comment

From Firefighting to Strategic Leadership: Breaking the Cycle of Urgency
Image Credit: Depositphotos

In today’s fast-paced business environment, many senior executives find themselves perpetually in fire-fighting mode. This means they seldom feel the bandwidth to focus on the things that are most important to move the company forward.

Marc reached out to me at a time when, in his words, he had “fallen prey to the tyranny of the urgent.”

“It’s critical that I make a pivot,” he said. “My board has set some stretch goals that will require most of my time. I was already fighting to focus on what is most important. Now, I just don’t know how to dig myself out of this hole.”

Indeed, the constant barrage of urgent issues that executives face can demand their immediate attention. And, as in Marc’s case, this often occurs at the expense of being able to focus on more important, long-term strategic goals. This mode of operation, while seemingly productive, can create a culture of quick fixes and reactive decisions, ultimately hindering sustainable growth and innovation. It can also mentally and physically drain even the greatest of executives.

What can you do when this happens?

The Perceived Problem: Urgency Over Importance

Executives often perceive their primary challenge as the need to address urgent issues swiftly. The pressure to respond immediately to crises can be overwhelming, leading to a perpetual cycle of urgent task management. This sense of urgency is fueled by several factors.

  • Market Volatility: Rapid changes in market conditions demand quick responses to maintain competitive advantage.
  • Stakeholder Expectations: Shareholders, customers, and employees expect prompt solutions to emerging problems.
  • Technological Advancements: The fast-paced evolution of technology requires constant adaptation and rapid decision-making.

While addressing urgent issues is undeniably crucial, this focus often comes at the expense of more important, strategic initiatives that drive long-term success.

The Real Problem: A Culture of Reactivity

The real problem lies deeper than the immediate need to manage urgent tasks. It is rooted in a culture that prioritizes reactivity over proactivity. This culture manifests in several ways:

  • Short-Term Focus: Emphasizing immediate results over long-term goals creates a myopic view of success.
  • Lack of Reflection: The constant state of urgency leaves little room for reflection, analysis, and learning from past experiences.
  • Decision-Making Fatigue: Continuous quick fixing can lead to decision-making fatigue, where the quality of decisions deteriorates over time.
  • Inadequate Planning: Insufficient time and resources are allocated to strategic planning, resulting in reactive rather than proactive leadership.

This reactive culture not only hampers strategic growth but also creates an environment where systemic issues remain unaddressed, leading to recurring problems.

Marc admitted that his executive team struggled with the same issue, firefighting becoming the norm at the expense of focusing on the strategic.

“And if they are challenged in this way, it probably means that their own teams are also doing the same,” he said.

“I can guarantee it,” I responded. “If you and your team are experiencing this, it’s sure to ripple throughout the company. However, this can be turned around – and it starts with you.”

Solutions: Shifting from Firefighting to Strategic Leadership

To break free from the cycle of firefighting, executives must cultivate a culture of strategic leadership. This requires a shift in mindset, processes, and organizational structure.

Here are actionable solutions to facilitate this transformation.

  1. Prioritize Strategic Planning

    • Dedicated Time for Strategy: Allocate specific times in the calendar exclusively for strategic planning and reflection. This helps ensure that long-term goals are not overshadowed by daily urgencies.
    • Scenario Planning: Regularly engage in scenario planning exercises to anticipate potential challenges and opportunities, allowing for more prepared and proactive responses.

  2. Empower and Delegate

    • Build a Strong Leadership Team: Develop and empower a leadership team that can handle urgent issues, freeing up senior executives to focus on strategic initiatives.
    • Delegation and Trust: Delegate authority and decision-making to capable team members, fostering a culture of trust and accountability (see previous article on delegation).

  3. Foster a Learning Culture

    • Encourage Reflection: Promote a culture where reflection and learning from past experiences are valued. Regularly conduct post-mortem analyses of projects and crises to identify lessons learned. When Marc and his team implemented this, they not only pinpointed areas for improvement, but they used this as a learning lab to cultivate innovation.
    • Continuous Improvement: Implement continuous improvement processes that encourage innovation and the proactive identification of potential issues before they become urgent.

  4. Implement Effective Systems and Processes

    • Crisis Management Framework: Develop a robust crisis management framework that outlines clear roles, responsibilities, and protocols for handling emergencies efficiently.
    • Proactive Risk Management: Establish comprehensive risk management practices that identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks before they escalate into crises.

  5. Balance Urgency and Importance

    • The Eisenhower Matrix: Utilize tools like the Eisenhower Matrix to differentiate between urgent and important tasks, ensuring that important but non-urgent tasks receive adequate attention. Marc’s team began to review this as part of their weekly meeting to bring consensus to priorities and reported saving hours weekly by doing so.
    • Strategic KPIs: Define and track key performance indicators (KPIs) that align with long-term strategic goals, ensuring that progress towards these goals is regularly monitored and prioritized.

  6. Promote a Visionary Mindset

    • Vision and Mission Alignment: Regularly communicate the organization’s vision and mission to ensure that all team members are aligned with the long-term strategic direction.
    • Innovation and Creativity: Encourage innovative thinking and creativity within the organization, fostering an environment where new ideas and approaches are welcomed and explored.

Breaking free from the cycle of firefighting requires a deliberate and concerted effort to shift towards strategic leadership. By prioritizing strategic planning, empowering teams, fostering a learning culture, implementing effective systems, balancing urgency and importance, and promoting a visionary mindset, executives can transform their organizations from reactive to proactive. This shift not only enhances the organization’s ability to navigate immediate challenges but also positions it for sustained long-term success. In the end, moving away from firefighting and towards strategic leadership is not just a necessity—it’s a strategic imperative.

This transformation is not easy and requires a significant shift in mindset and organizational culture. The list of potential strategic solutions may feel daunting. I encourage you to pick one or two areas and start there, integrating more along the way. Even one tool listed above will move the needle for you.

Indeed, the rewards—sustainable growth, innovation, and a resilient organization—are well worth the effort. Executives who embrace this shift will find themselves better equipped to lead their organizations through the complexities of today’s business environment and beyond.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

The High Costs of Not Delegating

By Leave a Comment

The High Costs of Not Delegating
Image Credit: Depositphotos

You are buried at work. You keep digging through urgent problems and you are frustrated. It doesn’t stop.

Will you ever reach a point where you can focus on the things that matter most?

And how much stress are you carrying because of this? What is its impact to you? To the organization?

The bottom line is that you will always be confronted with the urgent and unexpected. So, if you are saying things to yourself like, “Once I get this out of the way, I’ll be able to..,” think, again. You have a choice: you can decide to keep doing what you are doing and anticipate the same results, or you can make the hard decision to stop the madness and make a change.

In the high-stakes world of leadership, delegating effectively is one of the most powerful things you can do to work more effectively and make greater impact.

When you consider the high return, what is holding you back?

In working with senior leaders, I have found that the top five reasons they struggle with delegation all come back to fear.

What are you afraid of?

Here are five client scenarios. Each made the shift from overloaded and overwhelmed to focus, ease, and what matters most.

  1. Perfectionism and Control

Sarah, the CEO of a fast-growing tech startup, was known for her meticulous attention to detail. Her perfectionism drove the company’s high standards but also meant she often redid work done by her team.

When Sarah called me, her need for control had set her up to crash.

“I spend countless hours tweaking presentations and reports. It doesn’t seem like anyone else can meet my standard of excellence. I find myself working late into the night, and I can’t focus on the strategic initiatives we have targeted that will propel the company forward.”

After talking with her, it was also clear that beyond her overwhelm and stress, her team felt like they could never do anything right. Motivation was low.

“I’m just not sure my team is capable of getting it done properly,” Sarah said.

“Let’s put this to the test,” I responded.

I asked Sarah to begin delegating less critical tasks with regular oversight so that she could assess this. As she did so, she noticed her reports were eager to help and more engaged. This process built a foundation of trust for her in her team’s capabilities.

Sarah learned that part of the reason others were not meeting her expectations was that she needed to communicate them more clearly and to provide feedback to help the team improve. Over time, this approach helped them to learn how she wanted things done, and it freed her to concentrate on more significant responsibilities, enhancing her leadership effectiveness. Her team felt more valued and empowered, leading to greater talent retention. A win-win.

  1. Lack of Trust

James, a CFO, struggled to delegate financial reporting tasks. Missed deadlines and errors made by his team had eroded his trust in their abilities. He would end up handling most of the reporting himself, leading to immense pressure and stress.

“I feel like I babysit and chase when I delegate,” James said. “Wondering if someone will deliver on time and have it right – well, I just don’t have the patience.”

James’s lack of trust stifled his team’s growth and development. Talented employees felt frustrated and disengaged, as they were not given opportunities to take on challenging tasks. This mistrust also hampered the team’s ability to innovate and adapt to new challenges.

As James and I talked through the situation, I discovered that he had not set up an accountability process with his team. For example, when he gave a directive, he did not provide clarity. Further, he did not give a deadline as to when he expected to see drafts. And finally, he admitted that some of the team was overdue for training that would support their ability to perform at higher levels.

The problem was not his team – it was the need for a shared process.

Building trust required transparency and gradual delegation. James let the team know that he wanted to empower them to do more, and that he would be providing training, as well as a better way to communicate clearly about deadlines and review drafts. He started by delegating parts of the financial reports, closely monitoring progress, and providing constructive feedback. As he took this approach, and invested in training and development, it enhanced his team’s competence, gradually rebuilding his confidence in their abilities.

  1. Fear of Losing Authority

Laura, a senior VP, believed that holding onto critical tasks reinforced her authority within the organization. She feared that delegating would make her seem less indispensable and diminish her influence.

Laura’s reluctance to delegate limited her team’s ability to grow and take on more responsibility. It also prevented her from focusing on strategic initiatives that required her expertise. Over time, this behavior led to a stagnant team and missed opportunities for the company.

Things came to a head when the CEO called Laura in. As she reported to me later, her CEO had noticed the underperforming team – not her ability to achieve a lot. Further, he felt she was not focusing on what mattered most. That’s when they decided to call me in to help.

In working with Laura, it was clear that she needed to shift her perspective on leadership. This took time, but it allowed Laura to gain the confidence and clarity she needed to focus on what mattered most in her position. And by delegating effectively, she was able to focus on more strategic initiatives, demonstrating her leadership in driving the company’s vision forward. Mentoring her team and empowering them to succeed enhanced their capabilities and also reinforced her role as a visionary leader.

  1. Time Constraints

Mark was a COO who was always pressed for time. He believed it was quicker to complete tasks himself rather than delegate and review them. This mindset left him overwhelmed and unable to focus on strategic priorities.

Not surprisingly, Mark’s inability to delegate effectively led to chronic stress and burnout. He was constantly firefighting, unable to step back and take a strategic view of the business. His team, meanwhile, remained underdeveloped and dependent on his constant input.

Mark actually had to take a 3-month sabbatical for severe stress. During this time, he did a lot soul-searching and reached out for help. When he was ready to get back to work, we talked frankly about him taking time to invest in developing his team’s skills. Although this initially filled most of his calendar, it paid off in the long run as his team became more self-sufficient and acquired a greater understanding and ability to contribute. Clear communication of expectations and regular check-ins ensured tasks were completed to a high standard without his constant oversight.

  1. Previous Negative Experiences

Nathan, a VP of Sales, had a bad experience with delegation in the past where a critical task was mishandled, leading to the loss of a significant client. This experience has made him wary of delegating again.

Nathan’s reluctance to delegate hinders his team’s development and creates a bottleneck in decision-making processes. His inability to delegate critical tasks means he is perpetually overworked, and his team is left feeling undervalued and under-challenged.

Nathan can start afresh by identifying team members’ strengths and delegating tasks that align with their skills. Implementing a robust review process and maintaining open lines of communication can mitigate risks and rebuild his confidence in delegation. Learning from past experiences and making necessary adjustments can turn previous failures into opportunities for growth.

The Impact on the Team

In all these client experiences, it is important to note that, when there is a lack of appropriate delegation, team members can feel unrecognized, devalued, and disengaged. This is demotivating. Underperformance certainly follows, in addition to the lack of contribution they are able to make because they are not included.

Longer term, team members that are not provided with someone who cares about their development, and not provided the stretch experiences to learn and grow, will miss career opportunities, which is life changing.

The Broader Impact on the Company

The reluctance to delegate not only affects individual executives and their teams but also has broader implications for the entire company. Here are some of the key impacts:

  • Decreased Innovation: When executives hold onto tasks, their teams lack the opportunity to innovate and bring fresh ideas. This can lead to stagnation and a failure to keep up with competitors.
  • Inefficient Use of Resources: Executives spending time on tasks that could be delegated leads to inefficient use of high-level talent. This misallocation of resources can impede the company’s growth and agility.
  • Low Morale and High Turnover: Teams that feel underutilized and undervalued are more likely to experience low morale and high turnover. This not only disrupts operations but also incurs significant costs in recruiting and training new employees.
  • Strategic Neglect: Executives bogged down with day-to-day tasks often neglect strategic planning and long-term vision. This can lead to missed opportunities and a lack of direction for the company.

Moving Forward: Practical Steps for Effective Delegation

In sum, to foster a culture of effective delegation, executives can adopt the following strategies:

  1. Build Trust and Competence: Invest in training and development to enhance your team’s skills and build trust in their abilities.
  2. Communicate Clearly: Set clear expectations and provide the necessary resources and support for your team to succeed.
  3. Empower and Mentor: Shift from a control mindset to an empowerment mindset. Focus on mentoring and developing your team.
  4. Prioritize Strategic Focus: Delegate operational tasks to free up time for strategic initiatives that drive the company forward.
  5. Celebrate Success: Recognize and celebrate your team’s achievements to reinforce the value of delegation and boost morale.

By addressing the underlying reasons for hesitation and taking these first steps, executives can overcome their reluctance to delegate, leading to a more empowered team and a higher-performing, productive company. Delegation is not about losing control; it’s about multiplying your impact through the strengths of others.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Cracking the Accountability Code

By Leave a Comment

Cracking the Accountability Code
Image Credit: Depositphotos

Most executives in charge will find that accountability eludes them. In an effort to get things done, a senior executive may create a culture that is severe and unforgiving, with employees being terminated in rapid fashion. The executive hopes that different people will perform better than the ones dismissed – in most cases, faulty thinking.

Another senior executive will develop a soft culture, thinking that accountability is harsh – again, faulty thinking. This results in people at top levels chasing, babysitting, or actually doing the work of others in order to ensure that things get done.

Those who remain staunch in wanting to crack the accountability code will purchase expensive people management systems that ultimately may not work because of other factors. This kind of system focuses on just one of the three building blocks needed to reach healthy accountability.

The Three Building Blocks of Healthy Accountability

  1. Leadership Development.
  2. Performance Management
  3. Risk Governance

When carefully orchestrated, integrating these three building blocks will make a significant difference in a company’s sustainability, profit, and growth trajectory. On a more personal level, it supports the executive’s cognitive and emotional capacity, which means the executive will enjoy less stress, have a greater ability to think strategically, focus on what matters, make better decisions, and model and develop her people.

Let’s examine each building block and see how it plays out in business scenarios.

(Note: No matter what the size of your company, these three building blocks are still valid and necessary!)

  1. Leadership Development

Executives will need to shift their leadership style from traditional command-and-control to more empowering and coaching roles.

This involves:

  • Fostering empathy, compassion, and vulnerability.
  • Building psychological safety to encourage innovation and problem-solving.
  • Acting as a coach to facilitate constant learning and skill development among employees.

Leadership Development in Action: Elysian Enterprises

At Elysian Enterprises, CEO Sarah Jones noticed that her team’s creativity and problem-solving capabilities were stagnating under the traditional command-and-control leadership model she had inherited.

To begin addressing this, she embarked on making the shift to a more empowering leadership approach.

  • Empathy and Compassion: Sarah began by instituting regular one-on-one meetings with her team members, aimed at understanding their personal and professional challenges. This shift was inspired by a practice at Google, where managers are trained to start meetings with personal check-ins, enhancing team cohesion and emotional safety.
  • Psychological Safety: To cultivate an environment where employees felt safe to express ideas and concerns, Sarah introduced a ‘no blame’ policy for failed projects, focusing instead on learning from mistakes. This mirrors practices at companies like Pixar, where ‘brain trust’ sessions are held, allowing creative teams to present ideas without fear of criticism or repercussions.
  • Coaching Instead of Controlling: Transitioning from a director to a coach, Sarah facilitated workshops and provided resources for continuous learning. Inspired by the coaching culture at Microsoft under CEO Satya Nadella, she focused on growth mindset training, significantly enhancing her team’s adaptability and innovation.

  1. Performance Management

Effective performance management is crucial for holding people accountable. This includes:

  • Setting clear, challenging yet achievable targets.
  • Ensuring transparency in how these targets align with the company’s overall objectives.
  • Maintaining open communication about performance, where metrics are actively discussed and not just passively reported.
  • Instituting appropriate rewards and consequences to reinforce the importance of meeting targets.

Performance Management in Action: Orion Industries

At Orion Industries, CEO Mark Liu faced issues with underperformance and unclear accountability.

He overhauled the performance management system to align individual goals with corporate strategy.

  • Setting Relevant Targets: Mark introduced a system where targets were co-developed with employees, ensuring they were challenging yet attainable. This was similar to the approach at Intel with OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), where ambitious and transparent goal setting is standard practice.
  • Transparency and Communication: To improve transparency, Mark implemented a dashboard visible to all employees, showing real-time data on performance relative to targets, akin to Salesforce’s use of similar dashboards to drive sales performance.
  • Rewards and Consequences: Recognizing the power of incentives, Mark revamped the reward system to include both financial bonuses and recognition programs, such as ‘Employee of the Month’, which not only rewarded results but also behaviors aligned with the company’s values.

  1. Risk Governance

Robust risk management systems help ensure accountability at all levels of an organization by:

  • Establishing a clear risk governance framework that defines roles and responsibilities across the organization.
  • Implementing comprehensive controls and regular stress tests to manage financial, operational, and strategic risks.
  • Encouraging a culture where risk-aware decision-making is valued and practiced by all employees.

Risk Governance in Action: Proteus Corp

At Proteus Corp, a multinational company with diverse operations, CEO Linda Zhu strengthened the company’s risk management framework after a major data breach.

  • Clear Risk Governance Framework: Linda established a dedicated risk committee that reported directly to the board, ensuring high-level oversight and accountability. This mirrored the approach of banks like JPMorgan Chase, which have robust governance structures in place to oversee various types of risks.
  • Comprehensive Controls and Regular Stress Tests: Proteus Corp implemented regular IT system checks and scenario planning exercises to assess the impact of potential threats, similar to stress testing done by financial institutions as required by regulations like the Dodd-Frank Act.
  • Culture of Risk Awareness: Linda fostered a culture where every employee was trained to recognize and report potential risks, much like the safety culture at airlines like Southwest, where employees at all levels are encouraged to report safety concerns without fear of retribution.

Together, these steps form a comprehensive approach that a chief executive can use to build a culture of accountability and resilience that supports both individual and organizational growth.

In the next article, I’ll share why top executives still won’t delegate – and if you are one or are supervising one, what you can do to shift this.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Navigating the Maze of Polycrisis in Executive Decision-Making

By 1 Comment

Navigating the Maze of Polycrisis in Executive Decision-Making
Image Credit: Depositphotos

In today’s interlinked global environment, senior executives face not just isolated crises but a tangle of them known as polycrisis. This term refers to an entanglement of several crises that are deeply interconnected, affecting multiple spheres simultaneously and often exacerbating one another.

What does this mean for you?

For Jane, it meant not only her role, but her well-being. Jane was a senior executive at a multi-national corporation who faced significant challenges during an unprecedented polycrisis involving economic instability, public health issues, and internal team conflicts.

Initially, the compounded stressors led to decision fatigue, which blurred her focus on critical business drivers. Habitually, she found herself making decisions reactively, without all the necessary facts, just to keep pace with the evolving situations.

As the crises continued, Jane noticed a concerning trend: her ability to concentrate and engage in strategic thinking was diminishing. She described this as a “foggy brain,” a state where even simple decisions became daunting tasks. This cognitive clouding was not just a temporary lapse but a persistent condition that began to affect her leadership efficacy and personal well-being.

This showed in many ways – her decisions were sloppy and had a negative impact on the company, her team was nervous and wondered if she was ill, her credibility was slipping with her colleagues, and her CEO finally told her to go home for a week and figure out what was wrong.

When she called me, she had been home for three days and was ready to quit.

It was clear that she needed cognitive resilience strategies.

Through tailored mindfulness practices, prioritization exercises, and cognitive restructuring sessions, she gradually reclaimed her mental clarity. Over several months, Jane learned to manage her cognitive load more effectively, allowing her to make confident, strategic decisions once again, despite the ongoing uncertainties of the polycrisis environment.

Why didn’t I just direct Jane to rebalance her workload and delegate more?

On the surface, this issue seems to be the sheer volume of crises demanding attention. Executives often describe a sense of being perpetually behind, struggling to keep up with the cascade of decisions that each crisis requires. This often results in a reactive stance, moving from one urgent issue to another, which can feel like an endless game of whack-a-mole.

But it’s more dangerous than that.

Beneath the surface, the true challenge is the neurological toll that sustained stress takes on the brain’s executive functions. Persistent high stress disrupts our neural pathways, leading to a reduced capacity for the kind of complex, strategic thinking that senior executives need. It biases the brain toward immediate, fight-flight-freeze-fawn responses rather than thoughtful, long-term planning.

Over time, this chronic trauma response will affect more than your decision-making and stamina – this dynamic will wreak havoc with your physical and mental health.

This means that long weekends and delegating more simply won’t work.

So, what can you do to retain a strong capacity for complex, strategic thinking?

I worked with Jane to reframe her approach to decision-making. Here are some ways you can do the same:

  • Embrace Systems Thinking
    View the polycrisis through a holistic lens, recognizing the interdependencies and potential cascading effects of decisions.
  • Cultivate Cognitive Resilience
    Counteract stress and maintain cognitive function by incorporating resilience-building practices into your routine.
  • Promote Psychological Safety
    Encourage an organizational culture where team members feel safe to express concerns and ideas, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving.
  • Prioritize and Pivot
    Learn to dynamically evaluate and adjust priorities as situations evolve.

I also gave Jane some practical tools to strengthen her cognitive capacity.

Again, here are some tips and tools for you to consider:

  • Mind Mapping and Visualization Tools
    Employ digital mind-mapping software to chart out the complexities and connections between various crises. Tools like MindMeister or Coggle can help in visualizing these relationships.
  • Scenario Analysis
    Conduct robust scenario analysis using strategic planning tools. Software like Scapple or simple SWOT analysis templates can assist in preparing for various future states.
  • Mindfulness Apps
    Leverage mindfulness and meditation apps designed for busy professionals, such as Headspace or Calm, to build mental resilience and enhance focus.
  • Team Collaboration Platforms
    Utilize team collaboration platforms like Asana or Trello to delegate effectively, ensuring tasks are managed without micromanagement.
  • Regular Team Huddles
    Establish a rhythm of short, focused team meetings to stay aligned. Use these check-ins not only to track progress but to collectively recalibrate as new information emerges.
  • Continuous Learning
    Invest in executive education programs focused on leading in complexity and ensure access to similar learning resources for your team to build a knowledgeable, agile organization.

Jane and I worked together for a year and, during that time, her decision-making regained its sharpness. She recouped a tremendous amount of mental and physical energy, reignited her passion for her work, and was able to coach and train her team to do the same. Over time, she regained credibility and influence, and eventually succeeded the CEO.

By redefining the approach to decision-making within a polycrisis context, executives can regain control of their cognitive capacities, lead with clarity, and guide their organizations through the stormy seas of concurrent crises. These strategies and tools are not just lifelines but also instruments for crafting a more resilient and responsive leadership framework.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.