Patti Cotton

Executive Coach & Career Strategist

vision

From Firefighting to Strategic Leadership: Breaking the Cycle of Urgency

By 1 Comment

From Firefighting to Strategic Leadership: Breaking the Cycle of Urgency
Image Credit: Depositphotos

In today’s fast-paced business environment, many senior executives find themselves perpetually in fire-fighting mode. This means they seldom feel the bandwidth to focus on the things that are most important to move the company forward.

Marc reached out to me at a time when, in his words, he had “fallen prey to the tyranny of the urgent.”

“It’s critical that I make a pivot,” he said. “My board has set some stretch goals that will require most of my time. I was already fighting to focus on what is most important. Now, I just don’t know how to dig myself out of this hole.”

Indeed, the constant barrage of urgent issues that executives face can demand their immediate attention. And, as in Marc’s case, this often occurs at the expense of being able to focus on more important, long-term strategic goals. This mode of operation, while seemingly productive, can create a culture of quick fixes and reactive decisions, ultimately hindering sustainable growth and innovation. It can also mentally and physically drain even the greatest of executives.

What can you do when this happens?

The Perceived Problem: Urgency Over Importance

Executives often perceive their primary challenge as the need to address urgent issues swiftly. The pressure to respond immediately to crises can be overwhelming, leading to a perpetual cycle of urgent task management. This sense of urgency is fueled by several factors.

  • Market Volatility: Rapid changes in market conditions demand quick responses to maintain competitive advantage.
  • Stakeholder Expectations: Shareholders, customers, and employees expect prompt solutions to emerging problems.
  • Technological Advancements: The fast-paced evolution of technology requires constant adaptation and rapid decision-making.

While addressing urgent issues is undeniably crucial, this focus often comes at the expense of more important, strategic initiatives that drive long-term success.

The Real Problem: A Culture of Reactivity

The real problem lies deeper than the immediate need to manage urgent tasks. It is rooted in a culture that prioritizes reactivity over proactivity. This culture manifests in several ways:

  • Short-Term Focus: Emphasizing immediate results over long-term goals creates a myopic view of success.
  • Lack of Reflection: The constant state of urgency leaves little room for reflection, analysis, and learning from past experiences.
  • Decision-Making Fatigue: Continuous quick fixing can lead to decision-making fatigue, where the quality of decisions deteriorates over time.
  • Inadequate Planning: Insufficient time and resources are allocated to strategic planning, resulting in reactive rather than proactive leadership.

This reactive culture not only hampers strategic growth but also creates an environment where systemic issues remain unaddressed, leading to recurring problems.

Marc admitted that his executive team struggled with the same issue, firefighting becoming the norm at the expense of focusing on the strategic.

“And if they are challenged in this way, it probably means that their own teams are also doing the same,” he said.

“I can guarantee it,” I responded. “If you and your team are experiencing this, it’s sure to ripple throughout the company. However, this can be turned around – and it starts with you.”

Solutions: Shifting from Firefighting to Strategic Leadership

To break free from the cycle of firefighting, executives must cultivate a culture of strategic leadership. This requires a shift in mindset, processes, and organizational structure.

Here are actionable solutions to facilitate this transformation.

  1. Prioritize Strategic Planning

    • Dedicated Time for Strategy: Allocate specific times in the calendar exclusively for strategic planning and reflection. This helps ensure that long-term goals are not overshadowed by daily urgencies.
    • Scenario Planning: Regularly engage in scenario planning exercises to anticipate potential challenges and opportunities, allowing for more prepared and proactive responses.

  2. Empower and Delegate

    • Build a Strong Leadership Team: Develop and empower a leadership team that can handle urgent issues, freeing up senior executives to focus on strategic initiatives.
    • Delegation and Trust: Delegate authority and decision-making to capable team members, fostering a culture of trust and accountability (see previous article on delegation).

  3. Foster a Learning Culture

    • Encourage Reflection: Promote a culture where reflection and learning from past experiences are valued. Regularly conduct post-mortem analyses of projects and crises to identify lessons learned. When Marc and his team implemented this, they not only pinpointed areas for improvement, but they used this as a learning lab to cultivate innovation.
    • Continuous Improvement: Implement continuous improvement processes that encourage innovation and the proactive identification of potential issues before they become urgent.

  4. Implement Effective Systems and Processes

    • Crisis Management Framework: Develop a robust crisis management framework that outlines clear roles, responsibilities, and protocols for handling emergencies efficiently.
    • Proactive Risk Management: Establish comprehensive risk management practices that identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks before they escalate into crises.

  5. Balance Urgency and Importance

    • The Eisenhower Matrix: Utilize tools like the Eisenhower Matrix to differentiate between urgent and important tasks, ensuring that important but non-urgent tasks receive adequate attention. Marc’s team began to review this as part of their weekly meeting to bring consensus to priorities and reported saving hours weekly by doing so.
    • Strategic KPIs: Define and track key performance indicators (KPIs) that align with long-term strategic goals, ensuring that progress towards these goals is regularly monitored and prioritized.

  6. Promote a Visionary Mindset

    • Vision and Mission Alignment: Regularly communicate the organization’s vision and mission to ensure that all team members are aligned with the long-term strategic direction.
    • Innovation and Creativity: Encourage innovative thinking and creativity within the organization, fostering an environment where new ideas and approaches are welcomed and explored.

Breaking free from the cycle of firefighting requires a deliberate and concerted effort to shift towards strategic leadership. By prioritizing strategic planning, empowering teams, fostering a learning culture, implementing effective systems, balancing urgency and importance, and promoting a visionary mindset, executives can transform their organizations from reactive to proactive. This shift not only enhances the organization’s ability to navigate immediate challenges but also positions it for sustained long-term success. In the end, moving away from firefighting and towards strategic leadership is not just a necessity—it’s a strategic imperative.

This transformation is not easy and requires a significant shift in mindset and organizational culture. The list of potential strategic solutions may feel daunting. I encourage you to pick one or two areas and start there, integrating more along the way. Even one tool listed above will move the needle for you.

Indeed, the rewards—sustainable growth, innovation, and a resilient organization—are well worth the effort. Executives who embrace this shift will find themselves better equipped to lead their organizations through the complexities of today’s business environment and beyond.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Navigating the Maze of Polycrisis in Executive Decision-Making

By 1 Comment

Navigating the Maze of Polycrisis in Executive Decision-Making
Image Credit: Depositphotos

In today’s interlinked global environment, senior executives face not just isolated crises but a tangle of them known as polycrisis. This term refers to an entanglement of several crises that are deeply interconnected, affecting multiple spheres simultaneously and often exacerbating one another.

What does this mean for you?

For Jane, it meant not only her role, but her well-being. Jane was a senior executive at a multi-national corporation who faced significant challenges during an unprecedented polycrisis involving economic instability, public health issues, and internal team conflicts.

Initially, the compounded stressors led to decision fatigue, which blurred her focus on critical business drivers. Habitually, she found herself making decisions reactively, without all the necessary facts, just to keep pace with the evolving situations.

As the crises continued, Jane noticed a concerning trend: her ability to concentrate and engage in strategic thinking was diminishing. She described this as a “foggy brain,” a state where even simple decisions became daunting tasks. This cognitive clouding was not just a temporary lapse but a persistent condition that began to affect her leadership efficacy and personal well-being.

This showed in many ways – her decisions were sloppy and had a negative impact on the company, her team was nervous and wondered if she was ill, her credibility was slipping with her colleagues, and her CEO finally told her to go home for a week and figure out what was wrong.

When she called me, she had been home for three days and was ready to quit.

It was clear that she needed cognitive resilience strategies.

Through tailored mindfulness practices, prioritization exercises, and cognitive restructuring sessions, she gradually reclaimed her mental clarity. Over several months, Jane learned to manage her cognitive load more effectively, allowing her to make confident, strategic decisions once again, despite the ongoing uncertainties of the polycrisis environment.

Why didn’t I just direct Jane to rebalance her workload and delegate more?

On the surface, this issue seems to be the sheer volume of crises demanding attention. Executives often describe a sense of being perpetually behind, struggling to keep up with the cascade of decisions that each crisis requires. This often results in a reactive stance, moving from one urgent issue to another, which can feel like an endless game of whack-a-mole.

But it’s more dangerous than that.

Beneath the surface, the true challenge is the neurological toll that sustained stress takes on the brain’s executive functions. Persistent high stress disrupts our neural pathways, leading to a reduced capacity for the kind of complex, strategic thinking that senior executives need. It biases the brain toward immediate, fight-flight-freeze-fawn responses rather than thoughtful, long-term planning.

Over time, this chronic trauma response will affect more than your decision-making and stamina – this dynamic will wreak havoc with your physical and mental health.

This means that long weekends and delegating more simply won’t work.

So, what can you do to retain a strong capacity for complex, strategic thinking?

I worked with Jane to reframe her approach to decision-making. Here are some ways you can do the same:

  • Embrace Systems Thinking
    View the polycrisis through a holistic lens, recognizing the interdependencies and potential cascading effects of decisions.
  • Cultivate Cognitive Resilience
    Counteract stress and maintain cognitive function by incorporating resilience-building practices into your routine.
  • Promote Psychological Safety
    Encourage an organizational culture where team members feel safe to express concerns and ideas, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving.
  • Prioritize and Pivot
    Learn to dynamically evaluate and adjust priorities as situations evolve.

I also gave Jane some practical tools to strengthen her cognitive capacity.

Again, here are some tips and tools for you to consider:

  • Mind Mapping and Visualization Tools
    Employ digital mind-mapping software to chart out the complexities and connections between various crises. Tools like MindMeister or Coggle can help in visualizing these relationships.
  • Scenario Analysis
    Conduct robust scenario analysis using strategic planning tools. Software like Scapple or simple SWOT analysis templates can assist in preparing for various future states.
  • Mindfulness Apps
    Leverage mindfulness and meditation apps designed for busy professionals, such as Headspace or Calm, to build mental resilience and enhance focus.
  • Team Collaboration Platforms
    Utilize team collaboration platforms like Asana or Trello to delegate effectively, ensuring tasks are managed without micromanagement.
  • Regular Team Huddles
    Establish a rhythm of short, focused team meetings to stay aligned. Use these check-ins not only to track progress but to collectively recalibrate as new information emerges.
  • Continuous Learning
    Invest in executive education programs focused on leading in complexity and ensure access to similar learning resources for your team to build a knowledgeable, agile organization.

Jane and I worked together for a year and, during that time, her decision-making regained its sharpness. She recouped a tremendous amount of mental and physical energy, reignited her passion for her work, and was able to coach and train her team to do the same. Over time, she regained credibility and influence, and eventually succeeded the CEO.

By redefining the approach to decision-making within a polycrisis context, executives can regain control of their cognitive capacities, lead with clarity, and guide their organizations through the stormy seas of concurrent crises. These strategies and tools are not just lifelines but also instruments for crafting a more resilient and responsive leadership framework.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

The Neuroscience of Leadership: The Power of Emotional Agility

By Leave a Comment

The Neuroscience of Leadership: The Power of Emotional Agility
Image Credit: Depositphotos

As you navigate the intricate paths of leadership, it is important to note that cognitive agility is indispensable (see previous article). This ability to flex deftly with thinking allows leaders to pivot swiftly, grasp complexities, and address challenges with creativity and insight.

However, without its strategic partner, emotional agility, even the sharpest cognitive dexterity can falter, leading to poor decision-making, strained team relationships, and a lack of vision.

Imagine a pilot flying a plane with only one working engine. The aircraft might still stay airborne for a while, but the lack of full power severely limits its maneuverability and ability to reach its destination safely. Moreover, reaching the intended destination is now at significant risk – and the mental and emotional exertion required of the pilot to attempt a safe landing anywhere is substantial.

In the same way, cognitive and emotional capacity are like the two engines a leader needs to navigate challenges effectively. Without both engines functioning, the journey becomes much riskier.

What is emotional agility?

Quite simply, it’s the ability to remain adaptable in our thoughts and emotions, allowing us to respond effectively to daily situations. It acknowledges that we all experience a wide range of emotions, whether positive, negative, or neutral, which is a natural part of life. Being emotionally agile means approaching these emotions with a light touch and viewing them not as commands but as information to guide us in making choices aligned with our values.

Why is this important?

Emotionally dysregulated leaders can find themselves making decisions based on impulsive reactions rather than rational thinking. When emotions govern our actions without the filter of reason, mistakes are often the result. This can lead to hasty decisions that lack foresight and planning, affecting not only the leader but the entire team and organization. Teams led by emotionally reactive leaders often experience low morale, high turnover, and a toxic culture, as negative emotions ripple through the workplace.

Without emotional agility, leaders are also prone to confirmation bias, seeking information that supports their feelings and dismissing contradictory evidence. This can lead to poor strategic choices that ignore potential risks and miss opportunities.

In the end, cognitive agility alone can’t save a leader from the pitfalls of unchecked emotions.

An Example

I was once contacted by an executive we will call Sarah Thompson (this name is fictitious, as well as the name of the company and the industry, to protect confidentiality). Sarah, a seasoned executive, was at the helm of her family’s food business, Thompson Foods. Having grown from a modest local bakery to a multinational corporation, the business carried a rich legacy.

However, in recent years, it faced increasing competition, shifting consumer preferences, and internal conflicts. As CEO, Sarah was renowned for her cognitive agility, known for crafting innovative strategies and adeptly maneuvering the business through challenging waters.

Despite her strengths, however, Sarah struggled with emotional regulation. She often found herself overwhelmed by the weight of expectations, leading to emotional outbursts in meetings and critical conversations. Her mood swings left her team wary and hesitant to share insights. They feared triggering her wrath or disapproval.

Decisions made in haste and under stress became the norm, which led to a series of poorly executed product launches and growing frustration among senior executives. The morale at Thompson Foods dipped, and key members began considering their exit.

Recognizing the growing toll Sarah’s emotional volatility was taking on the organization, she reached out to me for guidance. In our initial assessment, we identified several patterns contributing to her challenges. Her inability to recognize emotional triggers and understand how they influenced her decisions was a key issue. She lacked tools to manage stress effectively, which escalated tensions in high-stakes situations.

Our work began with cultivating self-awareness.

  • Through structured exercises and reflective journaling, Sarah started to identify her triggers, like criticism from peers or unmet expectations.
  • We practiced mindfulness techniques to help her pause before reacting impulsively, allowing her to assess situations with a clear mind.
  • Over time, she learned cognitive reframing, which helped her view challenges from a constructive perspective, easing her sense of pressure.

Another significant aspect of our work was fostering empathy. I guided Sarah in improving her listening skills to better understand her team’s perspectives. Through role-playing exercises, she learned to respond calmly and constructively to differing opinions, helping to diffuse tension and build trust.

After several months of dedicated effort, Sarah exhibited remarkable transformation.

  • In meetings, she maintained composure, even when faced with challenging questions or disagreements.
  • This shift in demeanor encouraged her team to open up, share ideas, and collaborate more effectively.
  • Decision-making processes became more inclusive, leading to well-rounded strategies that harnessed the collective intelligence of the team.

Sarah’s newfound emotional agility had a ripple effect throughout the organization. Employee morale improved, and the rate of attrition slowed as trust was restored. Senior executives who had considered leaving decided to stay, invigorated by the positive changes in leadership. I received a note of thanks from one of her senior executives:

“It’s like night and day, here. I feel heard, respected, and I’m able to contribute.

What a difference! Thank you!” – PB

Thompson Foods soon regained its competitive edge, launching successful products that resonated with consumers and this brought the business back on track.

Sarah’s transformation into an emotionally agile leader not only saved the company from potential turmoil but also ushered in a new era of collaboration, innovation, and sustainable growth. The journey highlighted the profound impact of emotional agility in leadership, illustrating that leading with both the mind and heart can change the course of an entire organization.

Where do you need more emotional agility?

  • Are you able to harness the power of your emotions, allowing you to make sound decisions even in stressful situations? Mastering this enables you to stay in control of your executive function which is the part of your brain (your frontal lobe) that supports strategy, analytical skills, creativity and innovation, the ability to manage yourself well, and more.
  • Can you remain calm and collected, even in the face of adversity? This ability to manage emotions supports clear communication, better negotiation skills, and the ability to inspire confidence in others. It’s the foundation of safety and trust, fostering collaboration and innovation.
  • Are you able to be empathetic, recognizing the emotions and perspectives of your team? This allows you to navigate interpersonal conflicts deftly, build strong relationships, and motivate your team more effectively.

Developing emotional agility is a lifelong process. By committing to nourishing this within your leadership, you will enhance your cognitive agility, becoming more effective in decision-making, fostering healthier team dynamics, and building resilient organizations that thrive in any environment.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

How Do You Sustain Necessary Change?

By Leave a Comment

How Do You Sustain Necessary Change?
Image Credit: Shutterstock

You’ve made the changes. You have your business imperative in hand to keep you focused. You’ve aligned and coordinated your executive team around this business imperative. You’ve had some tough conversations to clear the air (and the plates), and you’ve identified the leadership behaviors necessary to support your team in making this happen.

But your team is scared. Or worse, they are at a point where they don’t trust this will work.

Michael, a well-respected CEO, had just led his executive team through these same steps. He was sick and tired of being in the weeds, feeling as though the company wasn’t meeting its business potential.

But his team was scared.

Sandra, his VP of marketing, spoke up. “We’ve gone through the exercise one too many times, and the changes sound great. We start out strong, then fizzle out. The changes we try to make don’t stick. I can’t even muster up the courage to try, this time.”

“Frankly, I’m skeptical, too” said Max, the COO. “We’ve tried and died quite a bit.”

“Patti,” Michael turned to me, “I may as well pack it up. If the team won’t commit, we aren’t going to make any progress.”

“Team,” I said, “Hold tight. There’s a last critical step in the process that ensures that you stay on the path. Most companies miss this step – and it makes all the difference.”

“I’m all ears,” said Candace, the CFO. “Because if this doesn’t work, I’m not sure I can retrieve any muster to move forward. At all.”

The room was quiet for a moment.

“I understand,” I said. “Change is hard. And unless we approach it in a way that supports its success, the discouragement is overwhelming. But hang on, please. Your track record is about to change.”

What did we do?

We created a system of accountability to hold the changes firmly in place. Because a change, no matter how big or small, requires a supportive system to allow it to become the norm.

And here’s how we did it for Michael’s team.

“Team,” I said, “You have taken the first 4 of 5 steps to make this work. Michael has created the company’s business imperative to set the direction (see Article 1 in this series). He has worked with you all to create and align your own business imperatives to support the larger one (see Article 2 in this series). You’ve surfaced some critical conversations that needed to be addressed in order to move forward (see Article 3 in this series). And you have identified how you need to work as a team in order to reach these goals (see Article 4 in this series). Now, it’s time for step 5: putting a system in place to keep you all on the path as you move into greater excellence.”

“I’m all ears, Patti,” said Candace. The others nodded.

“We are going to ask ourselves five questions as we review your goals and the changes you have identified that you need to make,” I said. “This will help us to create a system to hold the process – and ourselves – accountable. It will help us stay on track.”

Question 1: What are we measuring?

We worked to identify what we needed to measure in order to know that we were on the right path and moving at the right pace. What would we look for that measured success? We broke it down by quarter, and then by month, so we could course-correct in a timely manner if something was not working.

Question 2: Who needs to know?

We then identified key stakeholders for each initiative. Even though the team knew who was in charge of what, they did not always communicate to others who might be affected by the work. The team also identified how and when the stakeholders would communicate with each other and built this into their regular meeting agendas. Michael would review each team member’s progress for their area during their 1:1 meetings.

Question 3: How do we check on progress?

Michael took charge of this and built into the executive team’s monthly agenda discussion time to review the team’s alignment and coordination as they worked on goals. What was working? What needed refining or redirecting? The team looked at other feedback loop opportunities to make sure they could tap into needed information at any time.

Question 4: How do we support upgraded leadership behaviors?

The team recognized that working together at a higher level required higher skill-building. They asked me to work with them individually to break through any roadblocks holding them back, and to help them step into more effective leadership behaviors.

Question 5: What are the conversations we need to have now?

We agreed that I would also meet once quarterly with the team to work with them on any trust issues, as well as critical conversations and needed relational skill-building. Without this fifth step, a team does well at best, but never reaches its peak performance.

I’m happy to report that Michael and his team made incredible progress company- and team-wise in that first 12 months. And so, we decided to repeat this for Year 2, knowing that things would only continue to reach new and exciting heights. It is Year 3 for them, and they have established themselves as a leader in their industry.

Where in the process I have described above do you and your team excel? Where do you need to put a system in place, or to strengthen this so that it works well for you?

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

To Upgrade Your Leadership, Uplevel Your Leadership Behaviors

By 1 Comment

To Upgrade Your Leadership, Uplevel Your Leadership Behaviors
Image Credit: Shutterstock

How do you as CEO stay on top of your leadership game? Many think reading the latest books on this will keep things fresh. Others rely on bootcamps or CEO peer groups to stimulate their thinking about leading, and to work through business challenges.

Books can provide great insights. Bootcamps can certainly inform you of leadership trends and approaches you might want to consider. And peer groups can bring fresh ideas, community, and accountability.

But statistics show that none of these by themselves (or all together) yield the relevant changes that are most important. In other words, if you are spending significant amounts of money on your leadership in the ways we’ve just mentioned, you may be gaining some good value – but you are still leaving a lot of your leadership potential on the table.

How do you actually sharpen your leadership in the areas that matter most?

To strengthen your leadership, you need to know which areas of your leadership are ready for upleveling, and how to actually make these shifts in order to make lasting change.

Which of your leadership behaviors is ready for an upgrade?

You won’t really know what you need to change until you get good feedback.

As CEO, you may have a fair idea of those areas you need to sharpen. But as a human being, you also have your blind spots. And you can’t see your blind spots, because, well, they are blind spots.

Michael, our CEO in the last three articles, was given some feedback. As you will recall (see last week’s article “Confronting”), Michael was highly motivated to rise above the weeds once and for all, and to bring his team along with him. They had done some important work in establishing a company business imperative with top priorities over the next 12 months, and also identified what this meant for each executive team member’s focus and energy.

When it came time to identify what the team needed in order to accomplish these things, you may remember that the team members shared what they needed as to systems and processes, but also in behaviors – team behaviors together, and leader behaviors from Michael.

“I had no idea some of my behaviors were getting in the way of team effectiveness,” he confessed.

“The good news is, Michael, that you are well respected by your team. You received some good feedback, and we need to use it. Let’s talk about what you heard.”

“Well, I heard that I disempower people by allowing their employees to come directly to me – and I may counter what their supervisor has instructed them. And I also heard that I tend not to listen to the perspectives of the other executive team members when making decisions. Those are pretty big.”

“And I agree with you,” I responded. “Those are the two main behavioral shifts I heard, as well. Do you agree?”

“I agree. I’ll stop doing those things. Today.”

“Not so fast,” I countered. “That’s not the way it works. At least, if you want the change to be effective and to last.”

“Okay, I’m listening,” he said.

You need to identify upgrade behaviors for those you want to replace.

“Explain, please,” said Michael.

“You may know what you need to stop doing, but your brain needs a picture of what it needs to do, instead. For example, if you need to stop allowing employees to come in and work around their supervisors to get a better answer from you, what should you do instead?”

“Ah,” said Michael. “Okay. I need to redirect the employees back to their supervisors.”

“Now you have it!” I responded. “And what about being open to and listening to the perspectives of others?” I asked.

“Well, that one is harder,” Michael mused. “I thought I was open, but evidently I don’t appear to be so.”

“May I give you some feedback?” I asked. “I noticed in our team meeting that, when others gave a different opinion than yours, you acknowledged them, but then went right back to your own perspective. In other words, you didn’t ask them to tell you more, allowing them to share a different point of view, while listening carefully instead of waiting to jump back in.”

“Phew,” said Michael. “This may be tough.”

“True,” I said. “In fact, these kinds of behaviors take up to a year to shift so that they are lasting.”

“Well, how do I stay on track with that?” He asked. “I don’t have a lot of time to spend on this – but it’s key and I know it.”

“Fortunately, the third step is what keeps you on track,” I answered.

Track your progress regularly by getting feedback.

“Your team has given you great feedback. They can also provide you with info on your progress.”

“Like I said, I don’t have a lot of time,” he said.

“Oh, this is a one- to two-minute check-in about once monthly to see how you are doing. And of course, your regular coaching meeting with me to discuss how it’s going, what we need to do to break through roadblocks, keep moving forward, etc.”

“I see,” said Michael. “So, I’ll just be working as usual – only I’ll be integrating upgraded behaviors. That should not take more time – it’s just doing things differently.”

“You are getting it!” I said. “I’m happy to sit with you and put together a plan.”

Michael beamed. “I’m ready,” he said. “I think we are getting the formula for staying on top of the things we want most. If I can rise to the occasion with my leadership, I can bring the others along.”

What in your leadership needs upgrading? How do you know? Reaching the most important goals successfully starts here.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.