Patti Cotton

Executive Coach & Career Strategist

organization

Chesterton’s Fence: Why Change Is Not Always the Answer

By Leave a Comment

Chesterton’s Fence: Why Change Is Not Always the Answer
Image Credit: Depositphotos

As a business leader, it’s tempting to charge in, identify what looks like inefficiency, and implement changes to make your mark.

The impulse to prove yourself as a decisive and innovative leader often pushes you toward altering systems and structures right out of the gate. But what if, in your rush to change things, you’re actually dismantling something valuable—something you don’t yet fully understand?

That’s where Chesterton’s Fence comes in. It’s a concept every leader should consider before rushing to make changes. This principle, though seemingly simple, can save organizations from unnecessary upheaval and wasted effort. It encourages leaders to pause and ask the crucial question: Why is this here in the first place?

What is Chesterton’s Fence?

G.K. Chesterton, a British philosopher, once said, “Don’t ever take down a fence until you know the reason it was put up.”

This simple idea has profound implications for leadership. In essence, it means that before you change or eliminate something, you need to understand why it exists.

In business, Chesterton’s Fence represents the established processes, policies, and structures that might seem outdated or ineffective at first glance. But the problem is, leaders often fail to ask why these systems were put in place before dismantling them. This is a critical error.

The fence may be preventing problems you can’t see yet. It might be there for reasons tied to legal compliance, institutional knowledge, or operational efficiency. Only when you’ve fully grasped the original purpose can you wisely decide if it should stay or go. Otherwise, you might make things worse by pulling down something essential.

The Leadership Trap: The Impulse for Change

If you’re a leader, particularly a new one, the pressure to change things is enormous. You feel the need to make an impact, to modernize, optimize, and demonstrate your leadership. And while that impulse is understandable, it’s also dangerous.

Leaders often think, “If it isn’t new, it must not be good enough.” But not every existing process is broken. Not every policy is outdated. What’s worse, making changes too quickly without understanding the system can lead to unintended consequences.

Take a common scenario: a new leader walks into an organization and immediately restructures teams, implements new technologies, and overhauls company policies. Sure, they’ve made their mark, but have they made things better? Often, these changes lead to confusion, frustration, and even a drop in morale. Why? Because these leaders didn’t take the time to understand why things were the way they were before they decided to “fix” them.

Change isn’t inherently bad. In fact, in some cases, it’s essential. But change for change’s sake can destroy what’s working and replace it with something worse.

The Dangers of Impulsive Change

Here are a couple of examples that illustrate what happens when leaders jump into change without understanding the reasons behind existing structures.

Case Study 1: A Policy Change That Backfired

I worked with a company years ago that decided to scrap a long-standing policy because it seemed old-fashioned. On the surface, the policy appeared unnecessary and restrictive. But what the new leadership didn’t realize was that the policy protected the company from legal exposure. By removing it without understanding its purpose, the company exposed itself to costly legal risks and took a huge financial hit.

Case Study 2: A Team Restructure Gone Wrong

In another instance, I was called to work with a newly appointed executive who had decided to reorganize a well-functioning team to streamline operations. However, the team’s original structure was designed with specific interpersonal dynamics and skill sets in mind. The hasty restructure disrupted those dynamics, and the team’s productivity plummeted. What appeared to be inefficiency was actually the key to their success, and it took months to rebuild the lost synergy. Trust was lost, and we took some time in rebuilding it.

In both cases, the leaders acted with good intentions, but their failure to apply Chesterton’s Fence led to negative outcomes. By failing to understand the “fences” they were tearing down, they caused more problems than they solved.

Applying Chesterton’s Fence in Your Business

So, how do you apply Chesterton’s Fence as a business leader? How do you avoid the trap of changing things that don’t need to be changed?

Here are three practical steps:

  1. Investigate Before You Act

Before you make any change, ask yourself (and others) some basic questions: Why is this process or system in place? What problem was it originally designed to solve? Too often, leaders assume they know the answers without digging deeper. Your due diligence should prompt you to go beyond surface-level assumptions.

Take the time to talk to long-standing employees who have insight into why certain policies or structures exist. Look at historical performance data—what do the numbers say? By understanding the purpose behind the existing system, you’ll be better equipped to decide whether it’s really broken.

  1. Identify What’s Working

As leaders, we tend to focus on fixing what’s broken. But sometimes, the most important question to ask is: What’s already working? There may be processes, teams, or systems in your organization that are performing better than you realize.

Resist the urge to assume that newer is always better. Yes, innovation is important, but it’s not a virtue in and of itself. There’s real value in preserving the things that are effective. The grass isn’t always greener on the other side; sometimes, it’s greener right where you are.

  1. Make Incremental, Informed Changes

Once you’ve done your homework, consider making changes incrementally. Instead of tearing down the fence altogether, start by adjusting one section of it. Test new ideas in one department before rolling them out company-wide. Small, informed adjustments allow you to assess the impact without creating unnecessary disruption.

Pilot programs and incremental changes are a great way to innovate while respecting the structures that have served your organization well. It gives you the chance to correct course if things don’t go as planned.

When Change is Necessary

Of course, there are times when change is essential. Some processes are clearly outdated, some technologies truly need to be updated, and some systems are obviously inefficient. In those cases, by all means, take the fence down. But even then, do it thoughtfully, with a clear understanding of what you’re replacing and why.

Balance is key here. As a leader, you need to discern between necessary evolution and impulsive change. When you change, root it in data and a clear understanding of the organization’s current state.

Conclusion: Change Isn’t Always the Answer

Chesterton’s Fence offers business leaders a powerful lesson: before you change anything, understand why it exists. Sometimes, the best thing you can do is nothing at all—especially if the existing structures are working better than you realize. Effective leadership isn’t about changing everything you touch; it’s about making the right changes, at the right time, for the right reasons.

The next time you feel the urge to tear down a “fence,” take a moment to ask yourself why it was put there in the first place. You might be surprised at what you discover.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Combating Decision Fatigue: Empowering Executives to Make Better Choices

By 1 Comment

Combating Decision Fatigue: Empowering Executives to Make Better Choices
Image Credit: Depositphotos

Imagine Jane (a real situation, but fictitious name), a senior executive at a fast-growing tech company. Jane is brilliant, driven, and deeply committed to her role; and her leadership has helped the company outperform its two main competitors.

When I met her, however, Jane was feeling overwhelmed.

“Every day presents a relentless stream of decisions, both big and small. Honestly, it feels harder and harder to keep up. I’m mentally exhausted.”

What Jane was experiencing is decision fatigue, a common challenge for leaders like her, who oversee a volatile and dynamic environment.

Decision fatigue occurs when the quality of our decisions declines after an extended period of decision-making. For someone in Jane’s position, the constant need to make high-stakes decisions, coupled with managing complex issues, exacerbates this phenomenon.

Factors contributing to decision fatigue most often include the following:

  • Volume of Decisions – Jane faced an endless array of decisions daily, from strategic directions to operational details.
  • High-Stakes Nature – Each decision carries significant consequences, adding immense pressure.
  • Lack of Rest – Jane rarely took breaks, leading to mental exhaustion and diminished cognitive function.

Effect on the Team

As I talked with members of Jane’s team, it was clear that they were eager to support her and at the same time, concerned with how her leadership was taking a turn.

“She always seems tired, and when I present her with an issue, she seems to struggle to think clearly,” said one.

“True,’ said another. “She was quick to make choices that are straightforward, but they seem overwhelming, now.”

All agreed that Jane now became easily frustrated over minor issues. “I’m not even sure when to bring things to her attention,” said a third. “I’m starting to lose confidence in our ability to pull things off.”

It was clear that decision fatigue didn’t just affect Jane—it rippled through her leadership and organization, as it always does.

  • Jane experienced decreased productivity and heightened stress, edging towards burnout.
  • Jane’s impaired judgment and indecisiveness undermined her leadership effectiveness.
  • Her team’s morale and performance suffered, as they lost confidence in her decision-making.
  • This decline was starting to impact the company’s overall performance.

Internal Shifts and External Changes

To address decision fatigue, Jane had to make both internal shifts and external changes.

First, Jane had to recognize the real problem.

She initially perceived that she was simply overwhelmed by the volume of decisions. However, the real issue lay in her lack of effective decision-making strategies and self-care practices. Without these, the cognitive load became unmanageable.

Jane’s inner shifts included prioritizing self-care and mental health with regular exercise, enough sleep, and mindfulness and stress management techniques. This helped to recalibrate her nervous system and scattered thinking, and to replace this with a solid sense of calm and the ability to focus well.

She also needed to create a decision-making framework to simplify her process by categorizing decisions and delegating lower-stake choices.

These were simple shifts, but they required initiating new habits. As we worked on these, we also worked on some key external changes, including reviewing where Jane needed to delegate decision-making and how she might develop the trust to do so.

We also worked with her team to implement structured decision-making processes to ensure consistency.

And finally, Jane acknowledged that regular breaks and time off would be vital to helping her recharge. She recognized that this would be important for her team, as well, and they came to a mutual decision to implement this team wide.

What did this ultimately do for Jane and her company?

As I shared in the beginning, today, Jane’s company is out in front of her two main competitors with the lion’s share of the market. After establishing norms for decision-making, along with mental health and self-care, she was able to focus on developing a supportive work environment and to lead in the way that only someone in her role could.

What does this mean for you?

Jane’s story illustrates how decision fatigue can affect even the most capable leaders. By understanding its causes and impacts, and taking proactive steps to mitigate its effects, executives can enhance their decision-making capabilities.

Implementing both internal shifts, such as self-care and mindfulness, and external changes, like effective delegation and structured processes, can empower them to lead more effectively. This not only improves their well-being but also ensures their teams and organizations thrive.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

From Firefighting to Strategic Leadership: Breaking the Cycle of Urgency

By 1 Comment

From Firefighting to Strategic Leadership: Breaking the Cycle of Urgency
Image Credit: Depositphotos

In today’s fast-paced business environment, many senior executives find themselves perpetually in fire-fighting mode. This means they seldom feel the bandwidth to focus on the things that are most important to move the company forward.

Marc reached out to me at a time when, in his words, he had “fallen prey to the tyranny of the urgent.”

“It’s critical that I make a pivot,” he said. “My board has set some stretch goals that will require most of my time. I was already fighting to focus on what is most important. Now, I just don’t know how to dig myself out of this hole.”

Indeed, the constant barrage of urgent issues that executives face can demand their immediate attention. And, as in Marc’s case, this often occurs at the expense of being able to focus on more important, long-term strategic goals. This mode of operation, while seemingly productive, can create a culture of quick fixes and reactive decisions, ultimately hindering sustainable growth and innovation. It can also mentally and physically drain even the greatest of executives.

What can you do when this happens?

The Perceived Problem: Urgency Over Importance

Executives often perceive their primary challenge as the need to address urgent issues swiftly. The pressure to respond immediately to crises can be overwhelming, leading to a perpetual cycle of urgent task management. This sense of urgency is fueled by several factors.

  • Market Volatility: Rapid changes in market conditions demand quick responses to maintain competitive advantage.
  • Stakeholder Expectations: Shareholders, customers, and employees expect prompt solutions to emerging problems.
  • Technological Advancements: The fast-paced evolution of technology requires constant adaptation and rapid decision-making.

While addressing urgent issues is undeniably crucial, this focus often comes at the expense of more important, strategic initiatives that drive long-term success.

The Real Problem: A Culture of Reactivity

The real problem lies deeper than the immediate need to manage urgent tasks. It is rooted in a culture that prioritizes reactivity over proactivity. This culture manifests in several ways:

  • Short-Term Focus: Emphasizing immediate results over long-term goals creates a myopic view of success.
  • Lack of Reflection: The constant state of urgency leaves little room for reflection, analysis, and learning from past experiences.
  • Decision-Making Fatigue: Continuous quick fixing can lead to decision-making fatigue, where the quality of decisions deteriorates over time.
  • Inadequate Planning: Insufficient time and resources are allocated to strategic planning, resulting in reactive rather than proactive leadership.

This reactive culture not only hampers strategic growth but also creates an environment where systemic issues remain unaddressed, leading to recurring problems.

Marc admitted that his executive team struggled with the same issue, firefighting becoming the norm at the expense of focusing on the strategic.

“And if they are challenged in this way, it probably means that their own teams are also doing the same,” he said.

“I can guarantee it,” I responded. “If you and your team are experiencing this, it’s sure to ripple throughout the company. However, this can be turned around – and it starts with you.”

Solutions: Shifting from Firefighting to Strategic Leadership

To break free from the cycle of firefighting, executives must cultivate a culture of strategic leadership. This requires a shift in mindset, processes, and organizational structure.

Here are actionable solutions to facilitate this transformation.

  1. Prioritize Strategic Planning

    • Dedicated Time for Strategy: Allocate specific times in the calendar exclusively for strategic planning and reflection. This helps ensure that long-term goals are not overshadowed by daily urgencies.
    • Scenario Planning: Regularly engage in scenario planning exercises to anticipate potential challenges and opportunities, allowing for more prepared and proactive responses.

  2. Empower and Delegate

    • Build a Strong Leadership Team: Develop and empower a leadership team that can handle urgent issues, freeing up senior executives to focus on strategic initiatives.
    • Delegation and Trust: Delegate authority and decision-making to capable team members, fostering a culture of trust and accountability (see previous article on delegation).

  3. Foster a Learning Culture

    • Encourage Reflection: Promote a culture where reflection and learning from past experiences are valued. Regularly conduct post-mortem analyses of projects and crises to identify lessons learned. When Marc and his team implemented this, they not only pinpointed areas for improvement, but they used this as a learning lab to cultivate innovation.
    • Continuous Improvement: Implement continuous improvement processes that encourage innovation and the proactive identification of potential issues before they become urgent.

  4. Implement Effective Systems and Processes

    • Crisis Management Framework: Develop a robust crisis management framework that outlines clear roles, responsibilities, and protocols for handling emergencies efficiently.
    • Proactive Risk Management: Establish comprehensive risk management practices that identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks before they escalate into crises.

  5. Balance Urgency and Importance

    • The Eisenhower Matrix: Utilize tools like the Eisenhower Matrix to differentiate between urgent and important tasks, ensuring that important but non-urgent tasks receive adequate attention. Marc’s team began to review this as part of their weekly meeting to bring consensus to priorities and reported saving hours weekly by doing so.
    • Strategic KPIs: Define and track key performance indicators (KPIs) that align with long-term strategic goals, ensuring that progress towards these goals is regularly monitored and prioritized.

  6. Promote a Visionary Mindset

    • Vision and Mission Alignment: Regularly communicate the organization’s vision and mission to ensure that all team members are aligned with the long-term strategic direction.
    • Innovation and Creativity: Encourage innovative thinking and creativity within the organization, fostering an environment where new ideas and approaches are welcomed and explored.

Breaking free from the cycle of firefighting requires a deliberate and concerted effort to shift towards strategic leadership. By prioritizing strategic planning, empowering teams, fostering a learning culture, implementing effective systems, balancing urgency and importance, and promoting a visionary mindset, executives can transform their organizations from reactive to proactive. This shift not only enhances the organization’s ability to navigate immediate challenges but also positions it for sustained long-term success. In the end, moving away from firefighting and towards strategic leadership is not just a necessity—it’s a strategic imperative.

This transformation is not easy and requires a significant shift in mindset and organizational culture. The list of potential strategic solutions may feel daunting. I encourage you to pick one or two areas and start there, integrating more along the way. Even one tool listed above will move the needle for you.

Indeed, the rewards—sustainable growth, innovation, and a resilient organization—are well worth the effort. Executives who embrace this shift will find themselves better equipped to lead their organizations through the complexities of today’s business environment and beyond.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Cracking the Accountability Code

By Leave a Comment

Cracking the Accountability Code
Image Credit: Depositphotos

Most executives in charge will find that accountability eludes them. In an effort to get things done, a senior executive may create a culture that is severe and unforgiving, with employees being terminated in rapid fashion. The executive hopes that different people will perform better than the ones dismissed – in most cases, faulty thinking.

Another senior executive will develop a soft culture, thinking that accountability is harsh – again, faulty thinking. This results in people at top levels chasing, babysitting, or actually doing the work of others in order to ensure that things get done.

Those who remain staunch in wanting to crack the accountability code will purchase expensive people management systems that ultimately may not work because of other factors. This kind of system focuses on just one of the three building blocks needed to reach healthy accountability.

The Three Building Blocks of Healthy Accountability

  1. Leadership Development.
  2. Performance Management
  3. Risk Governance

When carefully orchestrated, integrating these three building blocks will make a significant difference in a company’s sustainability, profit, and growth trajectory. On a more personal level, it supports the executive’s cognitive and emotional capacity, which means the executive will enjoy less stress, have a greater ability to think strategically, focus on what matters, make better decisions, and model and develop her people.

Let’s examine each building block and see how it plays out in business scenarios.

(Note: No matter what the size of your company, these three building blocks are still valid and necessary!)

  1. Leadership Development

Executives will need to shift their leadership style from traditional command-and-control to more empowering and coaching roles.

This involves:

  • Fostering empathy, compassion, and vulnerability.
  • Building psychological safety to encourage innovation and problem-solving.
  • Acting as a coach to facilitate constant learning and skill development among employees.

Leadership Development in Action: Elysian Enterprises

At Elysian Enterprises, CEO Sarah Jones noticed that her team’s creativity and problem-solving capabilities were stagnating under the traditional command-and-control leadership model she had inherited.

To begin addressing this, she embarked on making the shift to a more empowering leadership approach.

  • Empathy and Compassion: Sarah began by instituting regular one-on-one meetings with her team members, aimed at understanding their personal and professional challenges. This shift was inspired by a practice at Google, where managers are trained to start meetings with personal check-ins, enhancing team cohesion and emotional safety.
  • Psychological Safety: To cultivate an environment where employees felt safe to express ideas and concerns, Sarah introduced a ‘no blame’ policy for failed projects, focusing instead on learning from mistakes. This mirrors practices at companies like Pixar, where ‘brain trust’ sessions are held, allowing creative teams to present ideas without fear of criticism or repercussions.
  • Coaching Instead of Controlling: Transitioning from a director to a coach, Sarah facilitated workshops and provided resources for continuous learning. Inspired by the coaching culture at Microsoft under CEO Satya Nadella, she focused on growth mindset training, significantly enhancing her team’s adaptability and innovation.

  1. Performance Management

Effective performance management is crucial for holding people accountable. This includes:

  • Setting clear, challenging yet achievable targets.
  • Ensuring transparency in how these targets align with the company’s overall objectives.
  • Maintaining open communication about performance, where metrics are actively discussed and not just passively reported.
  • Instituting appropriate rewards and consequences to reinforce the importance of meeting targets.

Performance Management in Action: Orion Industries

At Orion Industries, CEO Mark Liu faced issues with underperformance and unclear accountability.

He overhauled the performance management system to align individual goals with corporate strategy.

  • Setting Relevant Targets: Mark introduced a system where targets were co-developed with employees, ensuring they were challenging yet attainable. This was similar to the approach at Intel with OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), where ambitious and transparent goal setting is standard practice.
  • Transparency and Communication: To improve transparency, Mark implemented a dashboard visible to all employees, showing real-time data on performance relative to targets, akin to Salesforce’s use of similar dashboards to drive sales performance.
  • Rewards and Consequences: Recognizing the power of incentives, Mark revamped the reward system to include both financial bonuses and recognition programs, such as ‘Employee of the Month’, which not only rewarded results but also behaviors aligned with the company’s values.

  1. Risk Governance

Robust risk management systems help ensure accountability at all levels of an organization by:

  • Establishing a clear risk governance framework that defines roles and responsibilities across the organization.
  • Implementing comprehensive controls and regular stress tests to manage financial, operational, and strategic risks.
  • Encouraging a culture where risk-aware decision-making is valued and practiced by all employees.

Risk Governance in Action: Proteus Corp

At Proteus Corp, a multinational company with diverse operations, CEO Linda Zhu strengthened the company’s risk management framework after a major data breach.

  • Clear Risk Governance Framework: Linda established a dedicated risk committee that reported directly to the board, ensuring high-level oversight and accountability. This mirrored the approach of banks like JPMorgan Chase, which have robust governance structures in place to oversee various types of risks.
  • Comprehensive Controls and Regular Stress Tests: Proteus Corp implemented regular IT system checks and scenario planning exercises to assess the impact of potential threats, similar to stress testing done by financial institutions as required by regulations like the Dodd-Frank Act.
  • Culture of Risk Awareness: Linda fostered a culture where every employee was trained to recognize and report potential risks, much like the safety culture at airlines like Southwest, where employees at all levels are encouraged to report safety concerns without fear of retribution.

Together, these steps form a comprehensive approach that a chief executive can use to build a culture of accountability and resilience that supports both individual and organizational growth.

In the next article, I’ll share why top executives still won’t delegate – and if you are one or are supervising one, what you can do to shift this.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Is Your New Executive a Poor Cultural Fit – or Simply Situationally Unaware?

By Leave a Comment

Is Your New Executive a Poor Cultural Fit – or Simply Situationally Unaware?
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Most often, great new talent will fail, not because they are incompetent, but because they are what we call a “poor cultural fit.”

Such “poor fits” usually don’t last more than 12-18 months. It’s a big loss for the organization and the executive, both in morale and in the investment of money and time.

But more often than not, what is labeled as “poor cultural fit” is really a lack of situational awareness.

Is your new executive a poor fit? Or simply situationally unaware?

When Chris called me, she was completely demoralized.

“Patti, I have an excellent team. We’ve been through crisis and change and are even stronger than before. But I’m incredibly disappointed about my newest hire, Stan. He was the most promising talent when we onboarded him. And what a track record! But he’s not connecting the dots here at the company. He keeps missing the mark. He’s just an incredibly poor fit with our culture!”

“Chris, what are you seeing that tells you he’s a poor fit?”

“Well, he doesn’t seem to grasp the organizational structure when he makes decisions. The other day, he rode right over my top project manager to fast-track one of his initiatives. And even though we approach decision-making in a democratic fashion, he continues to call the shots on things in which he should include others. I guess I’ve hired a racehorse that doesn’t belong here.”

“Chris, is he willful or stubborn? In other words, is he trying to show off?”

“No, Patti – he truly just seems to operate differently, the way I described. Is there anything I can do?”

“I actually think there is, Chris. If my hunch is correct, Stan lacks situational awareness.”

“Explain, please,” answered Chris.

“Stan may simply need to develop a better lens in reading the social and political currents of the organization. Right now, it sounds as though he doesn’t have a good read on your organizational norms – the way you do things there. And he may also not understand the power relationships and how they work at the company.”

“Whatever it is, please help,” said Chris. “The other team members are distrustful of Stan, and his seasoned reports are shutting down.”

Chris arranged for me to meet Stan the next week. I felt sorry for him. He realized he was making mistakes and had become frustrated.

“I’m finding it very difficult to get things done here, Patti,” he said. “I’ve been handed some aggressive goals. and I see what’s possible. But I seem to keep treading on people’s toes, and there are obviously some unspoken rules around here. I’m lost.”

Stan and I talked a bit about his onboarding process.

“Truthfully, I was welcomed at a strategic planning retreat and met all my colleagues. I have meant to get around to meeting each one, learning more about what they do, how things work. But we have some time-sensitive goals, and they are pretty challenging. So, I’ve gotten to know them only through our interactions in team meetings. And, of course, I have a copy of the strategic plan with responsibilities assigned.”

“Who is mentoring you in this first phase of your employment?” I asked.

“Mentoring? No one. Chris says she’s available for any questions. But she’s pretty busy. I’m just pushing through this as best I can. But I’m really not making friends.”

I sat with Chris later and shared my thoughts.

“You have a bright executive. And he’s willing. He knows he’s in trouble. The challenge here is that he doesn’t have someone to walk him through the political and social networks he needs to know in order to get things done.”

“I’ve been pretty busy,” Chris admitted. “He does come in and ask questions from time to time. We talked through his responsibilities with the strategic plan. What else can I do?”

“Have you identified key stakeholders for each of his initiatives and introduced him to them?”

“No,” Chris answered slowly.

“Have you walked through your decision-making process here at the company?” I asked.

“No,” she said. Her shoulders drooped. “Wow. I’ve really messed up this onboarding, haven’t I? I’ve actually set him up for failure.”

“It’s not too late,” I countered. “Let’s sit with him and get a plan together. I don’t think you need to bear the full responsibility of this – but it needs to be orchestrated. I have some ideas.”

A few weeks later, Stan called me to thank me.

“What a difference,” he said. Taking the time to talk through how things work around here, how people get things done – invaluable. Having a couple of colleague mentors to help bounce things off of before I press a button – what a change. I just wanted to thank you.”

“Stan, I’m glad it’s working out,” I said. “You have a lot of contribute.”

“You know, Patti, I guess I should have asked Chris to help me come up with such a strategy. It never occurred to me since I had never encountered such a problem elsewhere. But – lesson learned.”

Lesson learned is exactly what Chris said later, as well.

“We all have our growing edges, Chris,” I said. “You have pushed through another one. You are on your way.”

What about you? Do you have an executive who finds it hard to get the work done?

Do they tread on others’ toes? Are they having trouble connecting the dots? It will be well worth your time to sit with your team member to explore where the gaps are. And be prepared because you may discover that one of the gaps is you.

In addition to resolving the issue, it could be a great opportunity for leadership growth at many levels, including your own.

The Clockwork of Excellent Leadership:   3 Essential Gears

What makes up excellent leadership? The essential components that go into leadership must all work together, or they begin to wear on one another and bring things to a stop. Learn how to keep them running like clockwork. Sign up to receive the  complimentary infographic.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.