Patti Cotton

Executive Coach & Career Strategist

morale

Combating Decision Fatigue: Empowering Executives to Make Better Choices

By 1 Comment

Combating Decision Fatigue: Empowering Executives to Make Better Choices
Image Credit: Depositphotos

Imagine Jane (a real situation, but fictitious name), a senior executive at a fast-growing tech company. Jane is brilliant, driven, and deeply committed to her role; and her leadership has helped the company outperform its two main competitors.

When I met her, however, Jane was feeling overwhelmed.

“Every day presents a relentless stream of decisions, both big and small. Honestly, it feels harder and harder to keep up. I’m mentally exhausted.”

What Jane was experiencing is decision fatigue, a common challenge for leaders like her, who oversee a volatile and dynamic environment.

Decision fatigue occurs when the quality of our decisions declines after an extended period of decision-making. For someone in Jane’s position, the constant need to make high-stakes decisions, coupled with managing complex issues, exacerbates this phenomenon.

Factors contributing to decision fatigue most often include the following:

  • Volume of Decisions – Jane faced an endless array of decisions daily, from strategic directions to operational details.
  • High-Stakes Nature – Each decision carries significant consequences, adding immense pressure.
  • Lack of Rest – Jane rarely took breaks, leading to mental exhaustion and diminished cognitive function.

Effect on the Team

As I talked with members of Jane’s team, it was clear that they were eager to support her and at the same time, concerned with how her leadership was taking a turn.

“She always seems tired, and when I present her with an issue, she seems to struggle to think clearly,” said one.

“True,’ said another. “She was quick to make choices that are straightforward, but they seem overwhelming, now.”

All agreed that Jane now became easily frustrated over minor issues. “I’m not even sure when to bring things to her attention,” said a third. “I’m starting to lose confidence in our ability to pull things off.”

It was clear that decision fatigue didn’t just affect Jane—it rippled through her leadership and organization, as it always does.

  • Jane experienced decreased productivity and heightened stress, edging towards burnout.
  • Jane’s impaired judgment and indecisiveness undermined her leadership effectiveness.
  • Her team’s morale and performance suffered, as they lost confidence in her decision-making.
  • This decline was starting to impact the company’s overall performance.

Internal Shifts and External Changes

To address decision fatigue, Jane had to make both internal shifts and external changes.

First, Jane had to recognize the real problem.

She initially perceived that she was simply overwhelmed by the volume of decisions. However, the real issue lay in her lack of effective decision-making strategies and self-care practices. Without these, the cognitive load became unmanageable.

Jane’s inner shifts included prioritizing self-care and mental health with regular exercise, enough sleep, and mindfulness and stress management techniques. This helped to recalibrate her nervous system and scattered thinking, and to replace this with a solid sense of calm and the ability to focus well.

She also needed to create a decision-making framework to simplify her process by categorizing decisions and delegating lower-stake choices.

These were simple shifts, but they required initiating new habits. As we worked on these, we also worked on some key external changes, including reviewing where Jane needed to delegate decision-making and how she might develop the trust to do so.

We also worked with her team to implement structured decision-making processes to ensure consistency.

And finally, Jane acknowledged that regular breaks and time off would be vital to helping her recharge. She recognized that this would be important for her team, as well, and they came to a mutual decision to implement this team wide.

What did this ultimately do for Jane and her company?

As I shared in the beginning, today, Jane’s company is out in front of her two main competitors with the lion’s share of the market. After establishing norms for decision-making, along with mental health and self-care, she was able to focus on developing a supportive work environment and to lead in the way that only someone in her role could.

What does this mean for you?

Jane’s story illustrates how decision fatigue can affect even the most capable leaders. By understanding its causes and impacts, and taking proactive steps to mitigate its effects, executives can enhance their decision-making capabilities.

Implementing both internal shifts, such as self-care and mindfulness, and external changes, like effective delegation and structured processes, can empower them to lead more effectively. This not only improves their well-being but also ensures their teams and organizations thrive.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

The High Costs of Not Delegating

By Leave a Comment

The High Costs of Not Delegating
Image Credit: Depositphotos

You are buried at work. You keep digging through urgent problems and you are frustrated. It doesn’t stop.

Will you ever reach a point where you can focus on the things that matter most?

And how much stress are you carrying because of this? What is its impact to you? To the organization?

The bottom line is that you will always be confronted with the urgent and unexpected. So, if you are saying things to yourself like, “Once I get this out of the way, I’ll be able to..,” think, again. You have a choice: you can decide to keep doing what you are doing and anticipate the same results, or you can make the hard decision to stop the madness and make a change.

In the high-stakes world of leadership, delegating effectively is one of the most powerful things you can do to work more effectively and make greater impact.

When you consider the high return, what is holding you back?

In working with senior leaders, I have found that the top five reasons they struggle with delegation all come back to fear.

What are you afraid of?

Here are five client scenarios. Each made the shift from overloaded and overwhelmed to focus, ease, and what matters most.

  1. Perfectionism and Control

Sarah, the CEO of a fast-growing tech startup, was known for her meticulous attention to detail. Her perfectionism drove the company’s high standards but also meant she often redid work done by her team.

When Sarah called me, her need for control had set her up to crash.

“I spend countless hours tweaking presentations and reports. It doesn’t seem like anyone else can meet my standard of excellence. I find myself working late into the night, and I can’t focus on the strategic initiatives we have targeted that will propel the company forward.”

After talking with her, it was also clear that beyond her overwhelm and stress, her team felt like they could never do anything right. Motivation was low.

“I’m just not sure my team is capable of getting it done properly,” Sarah said.

“Let’s put this to the test,” I responded.

I asked Sarah to begin delegating less critical tasks with regular oversight so that she could assess this. As she did so, she noticed her reports were eager to help and more engaged. This process built a foundation of trust for her in her team’s capabilities.

Sarah learned that part of the reason others were not meeting her expectations was that she needed to communicate them more clearly and to provide feedback to help the team improve. Over time, this approach helped them to learn how she wanted things done, and it freed her to concentrate on more significant responsibilities, enhancing her leadership effectiveness. Her team felt more valued and empowered, leading to greater talent retention. A win-win.

  1. Lack of Trust

James, a CFO, struggled to delegate financial reporting tasks. Missed deadlines and errors made by his team had eroded his trust in their abilities. He would end up handling most of the reporting himself, leading to immense pressure and stress.

“I feel like I babysit and chase when I delegate,” James said. “Wondering if someone will deliver on time and have it right – well, I just don’t have the patience.”

James’s lack of trust stifled his team’s growth and development. Talented employees felt frustrated and disengaged, as they were not given opportunities to take on challenging tasks. This mistrust also hampered the team’s ability to innovate and adapt to new challenges.

As James and I talked through the situation, I discovered that he had not set up an accountability process with his team. For example, when he gave a directive, he did not provide clarity. Further, he did not give a deadline as to when he expected to see drafts. And finally, he admitted that some of the team was overdue for training that would support their ability to perform at higher levels.

The problem was not his team – it was the need for a shared process.

Building trust required transparency and gradual delegation. James let the team know that he wanted to empower them to do more, and that he would be providing training, as well as a better way to communicate clearly about deadlines and review drafts. He started by delegating parts of the financial reports, closely monitoring progress, and providing constructive feedback. As he took this approach, and invested in training and development, it enhanced his team’s competence, gradually rebuilding his confidence in their abilities.

  1. Fear of Losing Authority

Laura, a senior VP, believed that holding onto critical tasks reinforced her authority within the organization. She feared that delegating would make her seem less indispensable and diminish her influence.

Laura’s reluctance to delegate limited her team’s ability to grow and take on more responsibility. It also prevented her from focusing on strategic initiatives that required her expertise. Over time, this behavior led to a stagnant team and missed opportunities for the company.

Things came to a head when the CEO called Laura in. As she reported to me later, her CEO had noticed the underperforming team – not her ability to achieve a lot. Further, he felt she was not focusing on what mattered most. That’s when they decided to call me in to help.

In working with Laura, it was clear that she needed to shift her perspective on leadership. This took time, but it allowed Laura to gain the confidence and clarity she needed to focus on what mattered most in her position. And by delegating effectively, she was able to focus on more strategic initiatives, demonstrating her leadership in driving the company’s vision forward. Mentoring her team and empowering them to succeed enhanced their capabilities and also reinforced her role as a visionary leader.

  1. Time Constraints

Mark was a COO who was always pressed for time. He believed it was quicker to complete tasks himself rather than delegate and review them. This mindset left him overwhelmed and unable to focus on strategic priorities.

Not surprisingly, Mark’s inability to delegate effectively led to chronic stress and burnout. He was constantly firefighting, unable to step back and take a strategic view of the business. His team, meanwhile, remained underdeveloped and dependent on his constant input.

Mark actually had to take a 3-month sabbatical for severe stress. During this time, he did a lot soul-searching and reached out for help. When he was ready to get back to work, we talked frankly about him taking time to invest in developing his team’s skills. Although this initially filled most of his calendar, it paid off in the long run as his team became more self-sufficient and acquired a greater understanding and ability to contribute. Clear communication of expectations and regular check-ins ensured tasks were completed to a high standard without his constant oversight.

  1. Previous Negative Experiences

Nathan, a VP of Sales, had a bad experience with delegation in the past where a critical task was mishandled, leading to the loss of a significant client. This experience has made him wary of delegating again.

Nathan’s reluctance to delegate hinders his team’s development and creates a bottleneck in decision-making processes. His inability to delegate critical tasks means he is perpetually overworked, and his team is left feeling undervalued and under-challenged.

Nathan can start afresh by identifying team members’ strengths and delegating tasks that align with their skills. Implementing a robust review process and maintaining open lines of communication can mitigate risks and rebuild his confidence in delegation. Learning from past experiences and making necessary adjustments can turn previous failures into opportunities for growth.

The Impact on the Team

In all these client experiences, it is important to note that, when there is a lack of appropriate delegation, team members can feel unrecognized, devalued, and disengaged. This is demotivating. Underperformance certainly follows, in addition to the lack of contribution they are able to make because they are not included.

Longer term, team members that are not provided with someone who cares about their development, and not provided the stretch experiences to learn and grow, will miss career opportunities, which is life changing.

The Broader Impact on the Company

The reluctance to delegate not only affects individual executives and their teams but also has broader implications for the entire company. Here are some of the key impacts:

  • Decreased Innovation: When executives hold onto tasks, their teams lack the opportunity to innovate and bring fresh ideas. This can lead to stagnation and a failure to keep up with competitors.
  • Inefficient Use of Resources: Executives spending time on tasks that could be delegated leads to inefficient use of high-level talent. This misallocation of resources can impede the company’s growth and agility.
  • Low Morale and High Turnover: Teams that feel underutilized and undervalued are more likely to experience low morale and high turnover. This not only disrupts operations but also incurs significant costs in recruiting and training new employees.
  • Strategic Neglect: Executives bogged down with day-to-day tasks often neglect strategic planning and long-term vision. This can lead to missed opportunities and a lack of direction for the company.

Moving Forward: Practical Steps for Effective Delegation

In sum, to foster a culture of effective delegation, executives can adopt the following strategies:

  1. Build Trust and Competence: Invest in training and development to enhance your team’s skills and build trust in their abilities.
  2. Communicate Clearly: Set clear expectations and provide the necessary resources and support for your team to succeed.
  3. Empower and Mentor: Shift from a control mindset to an empowerment mindset. Focus on mentoring and developing your team.
  4. Prioritize Strategic Focus: Delegate operational tasks to free up time for strategic initiatives that drive the company forward.
  5. Celebrate Success: Recognize and celebrate your team’s achievements to reinforce the value of delegation and boost morale.

By addressing the underlying reasons for hesitation and taking these first steps, executives can overcome their reluctance to delegate, leading to a more empowered team and a higher-performing, productive company. Delegation is not about losing control; it’s about multiplying your impact through the strengths of others.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Is Your New Executive a Poor Cultural Fit – or Simply Situationally Unaware?

By Leave a Comment

Is Your New Executive a Poor Cultural Fit – or Simply Situationally Unaware?
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Most often, great new talent will fail, not because they are incompetent, but because they are what we call a “poor cultural fit.”

Such “poor fits” usually don’t last more than 12-18 months. It’s a big loss for the organization and the executive, both in morale and in the investment of money and time.

But more often than not, what is labeled as “poor cultural fit” is really a lack of situational awareness.

Is your new executive a poor fit? Or simply situationally unaware?

When Chris called me, she was completely demoralized.

“Patti, I have an excellent team. We’ve been through crisis and change and are even stronger than before. But I’m incredibly disappointed about my newest hire, Stan. He was the most promising talent when we onboarded him. And what a track record! But he’s not connecting the dots here at the company. He keeps missing the mark. He’s just an incredibly poor fit with our culture!”

“Chris, what are you seeing that tells you he’s a poor fit?”

“Well, he doesn’t seem to grasp the organizational structure when he makes decisions. The other day, he rode right over my top project manager to fast-track one of his initiatives. And even though we approach decision-making in a democratic fashion, he continues to call the shots on things in which he should include others. I guess I’ve hired a racehorse that doesn’t belong here.”

“Chris, is he willful or stubborn? In other words, is he trying to show off?”

“No, Patti – he truly just seems to operate differently, the way I described. Is there anything I can do?”

“I actually think there is, Chris. If my hunch is correct, Stan lacks situational awareness.”

“Explain, please,” answered Chris.

“Stan may simply need to develop a better lens in reading the social and political currents of the organization. Right now, it sounds as though he doesn’t have a good read on your organizational norms – the way you do things there. And he may also not understand the power relationships and how they work at the company.”

“Whatever it is, please help,” said Chris. “The other team members are distrustful of Stan, and his seasoned reports are shutting down.”

Chris arranged for me to meet Stan the next week. I felt sorry for him. He realized he was making mistakes and had become frustrated.

“I’m finding it very difficult to get things done here, Patti,” he said. “I’ve been handed some aggressive goals. and I see what’s possible. But I seem to keep treading on people’s toes, and there are obviously some unspoken rules around here. I’m lost.”

Stan and I talked a bit about his onboarding process.

“Truthfully, I was welcomed at a strategic planning retreat and met all my colleagues. I have meant to get around to meeting each one, learning more about what they do, how things work. But we have some time-sensitive goals, and they are pretty challenging. So, I’ve gotten to know them only through our interactions in team meetings. And, of course, I have a copy of the strategic plan with responsibilities assigned.”

“Who is mentoring you in this first phase of your employment?” I asked.

“Mentoring? No one. Chris says she’s available for any questions. But she’s pretty busy. I’m just pushing through this as best I can. But I’m really not making friends.”

I sat with Chris later and shared my thoughts.

“You have a bright executive. And he’s willing. He knows he’s in trouble. The challenge here is that he doesn’t have someone to walk him through the political and social networks he needs to know in order to get things done.”

“I’ve been pretty busy,” Chris admitted. “He does come in and ask questions from time to time. We talked through his responsibilities with the strategic plan. What else can I do?”

“Have you identified key stakeholders for each of his initiatives and introduced him to them?”

“No,” Chris answered slowly.

“Have you walked through your decision-making process here at the company?” I asked.

“No,” she said. Her shoulders drooped. “Wow. I’ve really messed up this onboarding, haven’t I? I’ve actually set him up for failure.”

“It’s not too late,” I countered. “Let’s sit with him and get a plan together. I don’t think you need to bear the full responsibility of this – but it needs to be orchestrated. I have some ideas.”

A few weeks later, Stan called me to thank me.

“What a difference,” he said. Taking the time to talk through how things work around here, how people get things done – invaluable. Having a couple of colleague mentors to help bounce things off of before I press a button – what a change. I just wanted to thank you.”

“Stan, I’m glad it’s working out,” I said. “You have a lot of contribute.”

“You know, Patti, I guess I should have asked Chris to help me come up with such a strategy. It never occurred to me since I had never encountered such a problem elsewhere. But – lesson learned.”

Lesson learned is exactly what Chris said later, as well.

“We all have our growing edges, Chris,” I said. “You have pushed through another one. You are on your way.”

What about you? Do you have an executive who finds it hard to get the work done?

Do they tread on others’ toes? Are they having trouble connecting the dots? It will be well worth your time to sit with your team member to explore where the gaps are. And be prepared because you may discover that one of the gaps is you.

In addition to resolving the issue, it could be a great opportunity for leadership growth at many levels, including your own.

The Clockwork of Excellent Leadership:   3 Essential Gears

What makes up excellent leadership? The essential components that go into leadership must all work together, or they begin to wear on one another and bring things to a stop. Learn how to keep them running like clockwork. Sign up to receive the  complimentary infographic.

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Do You Have an Absentee Leader on Your Team?

By Leave a Comment

Do You Have an Absentee Leader on Your Team?
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Absentee leadership is rarely discussed, but it is perhaps the most destructive of all poor leadership types. It can do more to compromise employee engagement, morale, and productivity than other faulty leadership styles.

Unfortunately, it is also the most difficult of the styles to detect, which means you may have one on your team right now.

How can you detect whether you have this element in the executive circle? And what can you do about it?

Also called an emotionally disengaged leader, an Absentee leads in title only. They are people who are perhaps promoted into management because they did great work in their previous position, and they enjoy the perks and rewards of their current elevated status. However, they do not put in the hard work of engaging with their team to provide direction and support. You might say that they deplete the organization’s value because they are taking from it, but not investing back into it.

This affects the teams and individuals in their area of responsibility in a much more insidious way because absentee leadership behaviors can cause confusion in roles, conflict between staff, and increased stress leading to work and health problems.

Symptoms that you have an Absentee on your team can include:

  1. End runs for answers.

Do you have employees from a specific area within the organization that continue to come to you for answers? Ask yourself why. Allowing or even supporting this disempowers their leader and crowds your calendar. If you have not encouraged this dynamic, it may be that these employees are not getting answers from the person who should be supporting them. Don’t fall into the trap of giving a quick and easy response to these queries; instead, make time to sit with the leader who should be supplying answers and share what you are noticing. The goal of this exercise is not to punish the employees, but to explore why they are not getting answers. Deep dive on this one.

  1. Increased conflict or interpersonal problems.

Do you have employees or an area within the organization that cyclically erupts? This is a reflection of unmanaged emotions and a lack of ability to negotiate relationships. If this is a trend, it is a reflection of someone allowing this to continue. I would call this an Absentee leader, since the leader is either aware of the situation but steps back from confronting, or they are unaware, which is worse. Again, this requires a conversation and some coaching around expectations. You’ll need to stick closely to the Absentee during a corrective period to monitor their progress. Absentees can disappear easily in the company crowd. They are generally nice people who don’t make noise, which allows them to hide behind other more evident company challenges.

  1. Team grumbling or low performance.

When conducting employee forums or interdepartmental meetings, do you notice that dissatisfaction is expressed from the same corners every time? Is there a team that is known for its compromised performance? A chronic poor attitude or behavior in either individuals or team is a clear sign that someone is not present for their team, providing coaching, corrective feedback, and upholding expectations. Again, your approach would be the same – to sit with your Absentee and outline what you are observing, how it is impacting others and the company, and to define clearly what you want to see. Monitor, monitor, monitor.

This topic is worth careful study if you want highest ROI from your executive team.

The impact of absentee leadership on job satisfaction outlasts the impact of both constructive and overtly destructive forms of leadership. This costs your company not only now, but in future, since best efforts to turn this around take time.

And at a time when your focus needs to be on leading the organization into the future, you can’t afford to compromise.

HOW MUCH

DO OTHERS REALLY TRUST YOU?

​Learn the two vital parts to trust and how they can help you become a more highly effective leader.

GET THE INFOGRAPHIC

© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

A Powerful 5-Step Planning Tool

By Leave a Comment

A Powerful 5-Step Planning Tool for Executives to Finish Strong

A Powerful 5-Step Planning Tool for Executives to Finish Strong

It’s September.

If you are an executive in charge, acting “on purpose” to guide your team or entity to this year’s finish line is crucial.

I know it’s already on your mind.

Yet September is usually when I see executives start to slide.

 They have pushed hard during the first couple of quarters, and have allowed the summer’s workplace to slow things down.

Psychologically, it’s pretty tough to pick back up after ramping up and slowing down. It can cause stress, a feeling of overload as you try to get back on track, and a sense of being behind that can follow you through December 31st.

In fact, you may feel just a wee bit tired and demotivated just reading this, because you know what I mean.

Are you ready to get in front of this so you finish the year strong, avoiding the stress and overload that comes with year-end frenzy?

It’s time to get intentional.

I can help you do that so you finish out the next quarter in a strong and productive way that helps you and your team celebrate effectiveness and achievement.

It’s something I use with my private clients, no matter what time of year, to ramp up their success.

The 5-Step Powerful Planning Tool

1. Review your business foundation.

Gather your team and review your mission, vision, and values statements. Together, these should comprise a strong and exciting philosophy that does not change. These share the inspiration, the “why” of what you do that will fuel your motivation and drive over the next 90 days. Get clear on these before proceeding to step 2.

2. Assess your progress to date.

Review your current goals and strategies. Are these currently meeting and exceeding your business objectives? How well? Refer to any milestones and benchmarks associated with them to see if you are firmly on track, or if you need to adjust or shift any approaches you take to finish out the year. Celebrate the wins, cut the losses, and above all, quickly eliminate any work associated with that which is not working. Clear the deck for your last quarter.

3. Determine your priorities for the next quarter.

What priorities rise to the top? Identify or review the initiatives and projects associated with these. If you find it difficult to triage, do a quick analysis of priorities and projects so that you don’t hang on to the misnomer that “everything is equally important.” Take the lean and mean approach so you can finish strong, allow your team to be recognized well, and save your sanity.

4. Outline your 90-day action plan.

Working a 90-day action plan is incredibly effective at keeping you and your team motivated and energized, if you will include incremental milestones and short-term wins. So, as you identify major projects and activities, responsible parties and key stakeholders, ask yourself: What are the incremental milestones we can celebrate at the end of 90 days? Where are the best short-term wins to be captured that will support longer-range goals? And finally, do a quick assessment to ensure that the plan and its tenets support the enterprise’s mission, vision, and values. This is a great team-building exercise.

5. Up-level your ability to execute.

Use this 90-day action plan to perform a “personal 360°” on your plan and yourself. Have your team do the same, and then come together to discuss so that you can best support one another.

Here are questions to ask yourself:

  • As I look to the end of this next quarter, what commitments, activities, and calendar items do I need to shift, put aside, and/or eliminate in order to accomplish the 90-day action plan’s objectives?
  • What are those personal leadership behaviors I need to adopt in order to do well?
  • What needs eliminating?
  • What needs shifting?
  • What does meeting with my team to assess progress look like?
  • And how shall we celebrate our success at the end of these next 90 days?

I hope you enjoy this process as much as have my clients. They have used this for team-building, heightening performance, productivity, and morale.

What are your biggest barriers to meeting year-end goals? How do you move past these in order to succeed?