• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Patti Cotton

Executive Coach & Career Strategist

  • About
  • Consulting
  • Training
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • Contact

psychological safety

Cracking the Accountability Code

May 21, 2024 By Patti Cotton Leave a Comment

Cracking the Accountability Code
Image Credit: Depositphotos

Most executives in charge will find that accountability eludes them. In an effort to get things done, a senior executive may create a culture that is severe and unforgiving, with employees being terminated in rapid fashion. The executive hopes that different people will perform better than the ones dismissed – in most cases, faulty thinking.

Another senior executive will develop a soft culture, thinking that accountability is harsh – again, faulty thinking. This results in people at top levels chasing, babysitting, or actually doing the work of others in order to ensure that things get done.

Those who remain staunch in wanting to crack the accountability code will purchase expensive people management systems that ultimately may not work because of other factors. This kind of system focuses on just one of the three building blocks needed to reach healthy accountability.

The Three Building Blocks of Healthy Accountability

  1. Leadership Development.
  2. Performance Management
  3. Risk Governance

When carefully orchestrated, integrating these three building blocks will make a significant difference in a company’s sustainability, profit, and growth trajectory. On a more personal level, it supports the executive’s cognitive and emotional capacity, which means the executive will enjoy less stress, have a greater ability to think strategically, focus on what matters, make better decisions, and model and develop her people.

Let’s examine each building block and see how it plays out in business scenarios.

(Note: No matter what the size of your company, these three building blocks are still valid and necessary!)

  1. Leadership Development

Executives will need to shift their leadership style from traditional command-and-control to more empowering and coaching roles.

This involves:

  • Fostering empathy, compassion, and vulnerability.
  • Building psychological safety to encourage innovation and problem-solving.
  • Acting as a coach to facilitate constant learning and skill development among employees.

Leadership Development in Action: Elysian Enterprises

At Elysian Enterprises, CEO Sarah Jones noticed that her team’s creativity and problem-solving capabilities were stagnating under the traditional command-and-control leadership model she had inherited.

To begin addressing this, she embarked on making the shift to a more empowering leadership approach.

  • Empathy and Compassion: Sarah began by instituting regular one-on-one meetings with her team members, aimed at understanding their personal and professional challenges. This shift was inspired by a practice at Google, where managers are trained to start meetings with personal check-ins, enhancing team cohesion and emotional safety.
  • Psychological Safety: To cultivate an environment where employees felt safe to express ideas and concerns, Sarah introduced a ‘no blame’ policy for failed projects, focusing instead on learning from mistakes. This mirrors practices at companies like Pixar, where ‘brain trust’ sessions are held, allowing creative teams to present ideas without fear of criticism or repercussions.
  • Coaching Instead of Controlling: Transitioning from a director to a coach, Sarah facilitated workshops and provided resources for continuous learning. Inspired by the coaching culture at Microsoft under CEO Satya Nadella, she focused on growth mindset training, significantly enhancing her team’s adaptability and innovation.
  1. Performance Management

Effective performance management is crucial for holding people accountable. This includes:

  • Setting clear, challenging yet achievable targets.
  • Ensuring transparency in how these targets align with the company’s overall objectives.
  • Maintaining open communication about performance, where metrics are actively discussed and not just passively reported.
  • Instituting appropriate rewards and consequences to reinforce the importance of meeting targets.

Performance Management in Action: Orion Industries

At Orion Industries, CEO Mark Liu faced issues with underperformance and unclear accountability.

He overhauled the performance management system to align individual goals with corporate strategy.

  • Setting Relevant Targets: Mark introduced a system where targets were co-developed with employees, ensuring they were challenging yet attainable. This was similar to the approach at Intel with OKRs (Objectives and Key Results), where ambitious and transparent goal setting is standard practice.
  • Transparency and Communication: To improve transparency, Mark implemented a dashboard visible to all employees, showing real-time data on performance relative to targets, akin to Salesforce’s use of similar dashboards to drive sales performance.
  • Rewards and Consequences: Recognizing the power of incentives, Mark revamped the reward system to include both financial bonuses and recognition programs, such as ‘Employee of the Month’, which not only rewarded results but also behaviors aligned with the company’s values.
  1. Risk Governance

Robust risk management systems help ensure accountability at all levels of an organization by:

  • Establishing a clear risk governance framework that defines roles and responsibilities across the organization.
  • Implementing comprehensive controls and regular stress tests to manage financial, operational, and strategic risks.
  • Encouraging a culture where risk-aware decision-making is valued and practiced by all employees.

Risk Governance in Action: Proteus Corp

At Proteus Corp, a multinational company with diverse operations, CEO Linda Zhu strengthened the company’s risk management framework after a major data breach.

  • Clear Risk Governance Framework: Linda established a dedicated risk committee that reported directly to the board, ensuring high-level oversight and accountability. This mirrored the approach of banks like JPMorgan Chase, which have robust governance structures in place to oversee various types of risks.
  • Comprehensive Controls and Regular Stress Tests: Proteus Corp implemented regular IT system checks and scenario planning exercises to assess the impact of potential threats, similar to stress testing done by financial institutions as required by regulations like the Dodd-Frank Act.
  • Culture of Risk Awareness: Linda fostered a culture where every employee was trained to recognize and report potential risks, much like the safety culture at airlines like Southwest, where employees at all levels are encouraged to report safety concerns without fear of retribution.

Together, these steps form a comprehensive approach that a chief executive can use to build a culture of accountability and resilience that supports both individual and organizational growth.

In the next article, I’ll share why top executives still won’t delegate – and if you are one or are supervising one, what you can do to shift this.


© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Patti Cotton

Patti Cotton reenergizes talented leaders and their teams to achieve fulfillment and extraordinary results. For more information on how Patti Cotton can help you and your organization, click here.

Navigating the Maze of Polycrisis in Executive Decision-Making

May 14, 2024 By Patti Cotton 1 Comment

Navigating the Maze of Polycrisis in Executive Decision-Making
Image Credit: Depositphotos

In today’s interlinked global environment, senior executives face not just isolated crises but a tangle of them known as polycrisis. This term refers to an entanglement of several crises that are deeply interconnected, affecting multiple spheres simultaneously and often exacerbating one another.

What does this mean for you?

For Jane, it meant not only her role, but her well-being. Jane was a senior executive at a multi-national corporation who faced significant challenges during an unprecedented polycrisis involving economic instability, public health issues, and internal team conflicts.

Initially, the compounded stressors led to decision fatigue, which blurred her focus on critical business drivers. Habitually, she found herself making decisions reactively, without all the necessary facts, just to keep pace with the evolving situations.

As the crises continued, Jane noticed a concerning trend: her ability to concentrate and engage in strategic thinking was diminishing. She described this as a “foggy brain,” a state where even simple decisions became daunting tasks. This cognitive clouding was not just a temporary lapse but a persistent condition that began to affect her leadership efficacy and personal well-being.

This showed in many ways – her decisions were sloppy and had a negative impact on the company, her team was nervous and wondered if she was ill, her credibility was slipping with her colleagues, and her CEO finally told her to go home for a week and figure out what was wrong.

When she called me, she had been home for three days and was ready to quit.

It was clear that she needed cognitive resilience strategies.

Through tailored mindfulness practices, prioritization exercises, and cognitive restructuring sessions, she gradually reclaimed her mental clarity. Over several months, Jane learned to manage her cognitive load more effectively, allowing her to make confident, strategic decisions once again, despite the ongoing uncertainties of the polycrisis environment.

Why didn’t I just direct Jane to rebalance her workload and delegate more?

On the surface, this issue seems to be the sheer volume of crises demanding attention. Executives often describe a sense of being perpetually behind, struggling to keep up with the cascade of decisions that each crisis requires. This often results in a reactive stance, moving from one urgent issue to another, which can feel like an endless game of whack-a-mole.

But it’s more dangerous than that.

Beneath the surface, the true challenge is the neurological toll that sustained stress takes on the brain’s executive functions. Persistent high stress disrupts our neural pathways, leading to a reduced capacity for the kind of complex, strategic thinking that senior executives need. It biases the brain toward immediate, fight-flight-freeze-fawn responses rather than thoughtful, long-term planning.

Over time, this chronic trauma response will affect more than your decision-making and stamina – this dynamic will wreak havoc with your physical and mental health.

This means that long weekends and delegating more simply won’t work.

So, what can you do to retain a strong capacity for complex, strategic thinking?

I worked with Jane to reframe her approach to decision-making. Here are some ways you can do the same:

  • Embrace Systems Thinking
    View the polycrisis through a holistic lens, recognizing the interdependencies and potential cascading effects of decisions.
  • Cultivate Cognitive Resilience
    Counteract stress and maintain cognitive function by incorporating resilience-building practices into your routine.
  • Promote Psychological Safety
    Encourage an organizational culture where team members feel safe to express concerns and ideas, fostering a collaborative approach to problem-solving.
  • Prioritize and Pivot
    Learn to dynamically evaluate and adjust priorities as situations evolve.

I also gave Jane some practical tools to strengthen her cognitive capacity.

Again, here are some tips and tools for you to consider:

  • Mind Mapping and Visualization Tools
    Employ digital mind-mapping software to chart out the complexities and connections between various crises. Tools like MindMeister or Coggle can help in visualizing these relationships.
  • Scenario Analysis
    Conduct robust scenario analysis using strategic planning tools. Software like Scapple or simple SWOT analysis templates can assist in preparing for various future states.
  • Mindfulness Apps
    Leverage mindfulness and meditation apps designed for busy professionals, such as Headspace or Calm, to build mental resilience and enhance focus.
  • Team Collaboration Platforms
    Utilize team collaboration platforms like Asana or Trello to delegate effectively, ensuring tasks are managed without micromanagement.
  • Regular Team Huddles
    Establish a rhythm of short, focused team meetings to stay aligned. Use these check-ins not only to track progress but to collectively recalibrate as new information emerges.
  • Continuous Learning
    Invest in executive education programs focused on leading in complexity and ensure access to similar learning resources for your team to build a knowledgeable, agile organization.

Jane and I worked together for a year and, during that time, her decision-making regained its sharpness. She recouped a tremendous amount of mental and physical energy, reignited her passion for her work, and was able to coach and train her team to do the same. Over time, she regained credibility and influence, and eventually succeeded the CEO.

By redefining the approach to decision-making within a polycrisis context, executives can regain control of their cognitive capacities, lead with clarity, and guide their organizations through the stormy seas of concurrent crises. These strategies and tools are not just lifelines but also instruments for crafting a more resilient and responsive leadership framework.


© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Patti Cotton

Patti Cotton reenergizes talented leaders and their teams to achieve fulfillment and extraordinary results. For more information on how Patti Cotton can help you and your organization, click here.

How Safe is it for Your Team to Make Decisions Together?

November 11, 2020 By Patti Cotton Leave a Comment

How Safe is it for Your Team to Make Decisions Together?
Image Credit: Shutterstock

When making decisions as a team, do you have a few dominant voices and others that shrink back?

Though you are hoping for collective genius, it may turn out that your team suffers from giving in to the squeakiest wheel. In other words, it isn’t so much that the decision-making process is faulty – it’s more often the way the team interacts in order to reach answers.

What do you do?

That’s what Johann asked me.

“Here’s how it goes. First, a situation or challenge is presented. And then I open it up for brainstorming. Jack will always have an opinion, and Daniel will want to argue for arguing’s sake. The other four have learned to sit back and just let it happen. And I’m tired of refereeing. How can I help the team work together better to make decisions?”

“Johann, you are missing two-thirds of your team brainpower. That’s significant.”

“Yes, and I’ve tried asking the others what they think, to give them space to talk. But they just don’t want to enter into the fracas.”

“I don’t blame them,” I said. “Nobody wants to jump in to talk when it doesn’t feel safe.”

“What do you mean, ‘safe’?”

“Well, my guess is when the others have tried to speak up that they are cut down, their opinion is discounted or diminished, or they get the feeling it wasn’t worth speaking up. Am I right?”

“Yes, I guess so,” Johann said. “So how do you make it feel safe to participate?”

I shared 3 steps with Johann to begin creating psychological safety for the team.

Psychological safety allows team members to take risks, voice innovative ideas, and speaking one’s mind. When it is absent, team members begin to shut down and go along with the dominant voices in the group to feel safe. It doesn’t feel good to stick one’s neck out with a possible new concept or solution, only to feel shot down by someone else in the group.

What happens over the long term is that those team members whose voices are overshadowed by the more dominant voices simply default to the prevailing opinion. In other words, they take the easy road out by agreeing with the majority. In this way, they avoid conflict or feeling shot down. The problem is that those team members who give in may not really endorse the decisions made. They will go along with it, but their engagement will be low.

And when engagement is low, results are sub-par. You’ve lost the power of the potential talent on the team.

What to do?

1. Begin with a team charter around decision-making. Have the team list out what they need in order to give their very best to the process. Talk about what gets in the way, what prevents them from participating or bringing their top ideas to the table. Then, turn this around to a shared agreement about how you will operate going forward. If no one speaks up about the quieter voices, provide your own feedback on how you have observed this.

2. Shake up the process. For example, if presenting a particular problem to be solved, make the rule that there will be a question period before opinions are proffered. Make a game of it. Only questions for 10 minutes to get the information they need, and then open the floor for recommendations. This question period will allow those who have been reticent to participate to jump in. You might even have people write down their recommendations, hand them to you, and have you read them.

3. Break up old dynamics. Appoint a devil’s advocate (or two!) and charge them with countering the group’s consensus. Invite them to challenge and to ask the difficult questions. Research has shown that challenging in this way can improve group outcomes and the quality of the decisions made. Appoint a time-keeper and limit the team members to 1 minute apiece as they go around “popcorn style” to provide their input. Make a rule that the first person to speak after someone has providing an idea must say something positive about the idea. You are shifting dynamics to allow participation in safe space.

Johann agreed to try out developing the team charter and reported later that this revealed deep feelings of which he had not been aware. The team was able to talk frankly and to decide how they wanted to do differently going forward. Further, when he integrated more of the ideas into the decision-making process, it was enough to help the team move out of a limiting dynamic and into a healthier, more inclusive one.

How would you rate your team’s ability to make decisions together? Although I can’t promise that this approach will help your team to make better decisions, I can tell you with confidence that when you improve the interaction between your team members during the process, that it will boost your chances of a better outcome.


© Patti Cotton and patticotton.com. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express written permission from the author is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that attribution is made to Patti Cotton and patticotton.com, with links thereto.

Patti Cotton

Patti Cotton reenergizes talented leaders and their teams to achieve fulfillment and extraordinary results. For more information on how Patti Cotton can help you and your organization, click here.

Three Steps to Getting Your Team on Board

January 16, 2019 By Patti Cotton Leave a Comment

Three Steps to Getting Your Team on Board
Image Credit: Shutterstock

Have you come away from a team meeting confident that everyone is on board and ready to go? This is exactly what you needed in order to move the initiative forward.

But later, when you call people to action, you get pushback. They argue about time or resources. Somebody points to the executive down the hall.

“What about Jim?” they chide. “He ought to step up – he doesn’t have half the workload we do!”

How do you avoid arriving at this place? What can you do to make sure everyone is aligned and engaged?

Here are three steps to take so you can get your team on board from the get-go:

  1. Create psychological safety.

Your people need to know that, within the team, it is safe to take a risky stance. Such safety supports productive disagreement. Psychological safety requires that your team develop high trust with one another. How much does your team trust one another? For more on this, get the downloadable infographic below.

HOW MUCH

DO OTHERS REALLY TRUST YOU?

​Learn the two vital parts to trust and how they can help you become a more highly effective leader.

GET THE INFOGRAPHIC

  1. Surface assumptions.

Every human being comes equipped with assumptions. These are a result of our life experiences.

Is it summertime? The sky should be blue.

Is it dinner time? People should be getting hungry.

Some assumptions are not dangerous, and they help to guide us with everyday decisions. On the other hand, some assumptions can interfere with reaching consensus and alignment on important issues.

How can you ferret these out before they get in the way?

When your team meets, present the problem or initiative. Then, before they can ask questions or present any opinions, ask them what assumptions they will use in order to work together on this.

Are they assuming this will require…

  • Redirecting the workforce?
  • Additional budget considerations?
  • That their role will be modified in some way?

What other assumptions will they have?

Bring these to the surface and ask your team members to put these aside as you work. They may not be factors, and you will be able to address concerns more quickly as you move through the discussion.

  1. Expose misalignments.

Team members may feel agreeable during the discussion. However, some may not have thought things through in such a way that it reveals hidden roadblocks.

Get creative to stir things up. Consider taking discussions about new initiatives off-site. Present your idea as a hypothetical one and have them develop it as a team exercise.

Now, have them identify problems and work together to solve these.

After you have laid this foundation of collaboration, ask them to make it real, and talk about what it will take for the team to implement this. Again, have them problem-solve together.

Your team can begin to flex and increase its ability to perform at levels most will never experience.

I look forward to hearing how this works for you.

For more on psychological safety, see Amy Edmondson’s article, “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly; Jun 1999; 44, 2.

Patti Cotton

Patti Cotton reenergizes talented leaders and their teams to achieve fulfillment and extraordinary results. For more information on how Patti Cotton can help you and your organization, click here.

Primary Sidebar

Patti Cotton
Tweets by @PattiCotton
  • About
  • Consulting
  • Training
  • Speaking
  • Blog
  • Contact
Home | Contact | Privacy Policy

© 2024 Cotton Group LLC | PATTI COTTON 360° LEADERSHIP®